On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:47 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
>
> Recalling that such commitments were made as a part of the FESCO
> approval of this change (and its sibling - the dropping of YP servers),
> is this done yet?
Not as far as I know, but this Change was deferred to F37 today.
--
Ben
Hi -
> There really ought to be tested migration scripts or at least instructions
> supplied. [...]
> Could the Change proponents commit to producing transition instructions
> for servers & clients?
Recalling that such commitments were made as a part of the FESCO
approval of this change (and
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:00 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Company internal only is a rarity these days with cloud deployments
> and people putting Alexa's and similar devices on the company
> internet. That 'smart fridge' in the company workroom or 'smart tv' in
> the executive lounge is
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 01:53, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> > > > telnet**.
On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> >
> > > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> > > telnet**. Very simple to set up, very simple to use, and very
> > >
On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> > telnet**. Very simple to set up, very simple to use, and very easy to
> > steal all the information about logins, users, and setups.
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> telnet**. Very simple to set up, very simple to use, and very easy to
> steal all the information about logins, users, and setups. [...]
... well, compared to what? LDAP commonly distributes
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 23:47, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:37:18PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == User Experience ==
> > > For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may
> > > require
> > > some
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:37:18PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == User Experience ==
> > For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may
> > require
> > some learning curve for switching to alternative solutions.
>
> I've
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:37:18PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == User Experience ==
> For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may require
> some learning curve for switching to alternative solutions.
I've spoken with some of my sysadmin friends and universities, and they
suggest
Hi -
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> Users that were relying on support for NIS(+) will need to move to
> secure alternatives like LDAP and/or FreeIPA.
> [...]
> == User Experience ==
> For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may require
> some learning curve for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/drop_NIS_support_from_PAM
== Summary ==
This change is about dropping user-authentication using NIS(+) from PAM.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:besser82 | Björn Esser]]
* Email: besse...@fedoraproject.org
* Name: [[User:ipedrosa | Iker Pedrosa]]
* Email:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/drop_NIS_support_from_PAM
== Summary ==
This change is about dropping user-authentication using NIS(+) from PAM.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:besser82 | Björn Esser]]
* Email: besse...@fedoraproject.org
* Name: [[User:ipedrosa | Iker Pedrosa]]
* Email:
13 matches
Mail list logo
