On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 03:37, Niklas Schnelle
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 19:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:14AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David
On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 19:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:14AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David Cantrell wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:14AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:10:20AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:10:20AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:19:57PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > So I guess this
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 04:49:17PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The use-case for clients with different endianess is ''very'' niche.
> It was common in the 1980s when X was originally developed but at this
> point a vanishingly small number of users run clients and X servers on
> different machines,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:10:20AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:19:57PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > So I guess this means no remoting into ppc64 or s390x machines from
> > > > x86_64 or ppc64le
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:10:20AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:19:57PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> [...]
> > > So I guess this means no remoting into ppc64 or s390x machines from
> > > x86_64 or ppc64le machines without a configuration tweak?
> >
> > We don't have
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:19:57PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
[...]
> > So I guess this means no remoting into ppc64 or s390x machines from
> > x86_64 or ppc64le machines without a configuration tweak?
>
> We don't have ppc64 builds anymore and I don't know the last release we had
> that was
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:08:54PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 4:49 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:30:33AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
> laptops.
On 12/29/22 20:27, John Reiser wrote:
A years-earlier "by-hand" example of related coding in plain-C is
scripts/recordmcount.c in the source code for Linux kernel.
Yep, functions like htonl have been in use in C for decades.
It is sad to see this standardization to little-endian (e.g.
> Am 29.12.2022 um 16:29 schrieb David Malcolm :
>
> On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 13:03 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> When the connection fails, the
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 11:27:01AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> On 12/21/22 13:49, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
>
> > X server implementations (e.g. Xorg and Xwayland) allow clients with
> > an endianess different to that of the
On 12/21/22 13:49, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
X server implementations (e.g. Xorg and Xwayland) allow clients with
an endianess different to that of the server to connect. Protocol
messages to and from these clients are
On 12/29/22 08:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:10 AM Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:16:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:13 PM Peter Hutterer
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:41:06AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 13:03 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> > > > When the connection fails, the Xserver returns a reason in
> > > > plain text.
> > > > In
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:10 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:16:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:13 PM Peter Hutterer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:41:06AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:30 AM
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:16:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:13 PM Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:41:06AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:30 AM Niklas Schnelle
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:13 PM Peter Hutterer
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:41:06AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:30 AM Niklas Schnelle
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> > > Linux kernel
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:41:06AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:30 AM Niklas Schnelle
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> > Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> > their
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> > > When the connection fails, the Xserver returns a reason in plain text.
> > > In that case, the reason for the connection being rejected would be
> > >
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 10:24, Elizabeth K. Joseph
wrote:
> > This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> > Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> > their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
> > laptops.
>
> I first
On 12/22/22 10:24, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
>> This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
>> Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
>> their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
>> laptops.
>
> I first wanted to echo and
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> > When the connection fails, the Xserver returns a reason in plain text.
> > In that case, the reason for the connection being rejected would be
> > „Swapped clients prohibited“.
>
> Appreciate that there is at least some
> This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
> laptops.
I first wanted to echo and confirm what Niklas says here.
The crux of this
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:30 AM Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
> laptops. After all
Hi All,
This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
laptops. After all mainframes are pretty damn fast at compiling with
plenty of memory and
Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
Hi
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Peter Boy wrote:
How should this be documented so that it can be found by users who want to
connect to ppc64 (or s390x) a year from now, when no one has the change
proposal in mind anymore? Is there at
Hi
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
> How should this be documented so that it can be found by users who want to
> connect to ppc64 (or s390x) a year from now, when no one has the change
> proposal in mind anymore? Is there at least a descriptive error message?
When the
> Am 21.12.2022 um 22:49 schrieb Ben Cotton :
>
> Users with X server and client on two different machines must add the
> `xorg.conf.d` snippet shown above on affected systems.
How should this be documented so that it can be found by users who want to
connect to ppc64 (or s390x) a year from
On 12/21/22 21:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 4:49 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 4:49 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XServerProhibitsByteSwappedClients
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora
34 matches
Mail list logo
