Re: FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-29 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 08/20/2014 07:14 PM, Christopher wrote: As a hypothetical, I was mainly concerned about backporting a new F21 java package as a F20 update to make it available to users still on that version, and whether that would require javadocs. Just in case, I've added a %if 0%{fedora} 21 condition

Re: FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-20 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263 Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving updates? Or only F21 and later? It has been approved as a F21 Change, so it should affect only F≥21. Technically, the packaging guideline change is somewhat

Re: FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-20 Thread Christopher
As a hypothetical, I was mainly concerned about backporting a new F21 java package as a F20 update to make it available to users still on that version, and whether that would require javadocs. Just in case, I've added a %if 0%{fedora} 21 condition for javadocs, and the appropriate Obsoletes line

FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-19 Thread Christopher
Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263 Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving updates? Or only F21 and later? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org