Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

2012-03-06 Thread Panu Matilainen

On 03/05/2012 05:54 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org  wrote:


Hey,

I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process
at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze
that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to
get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F17, but it's
been almost a month now since filing the feature
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler, with
no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or request
corrections) that I can see.

Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17
preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to start
introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day before
feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with well before
F18 alpha even appears on the horizon.


I don't think you need to wait for the Feature wrangler here.  Just commit it
to the master branch and build for F18.  It's not like kernel, gcc, and glibc
upgrades sit around waiting on a Feature page to get looked at.

Unless there is something that requires a large coordination with other
packages, I think you're good.


Well, that'd be just fine with me, I've just been trying to play by the 
book. If it's ok for *some* features to proceed without prior acceptance 
then perhaps the policy should be clarified on that.


- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora 18 feature processing?

2012-03-05 Thread Panu Matilainen


Hey,

I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature 
process at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute 
inclusion craze that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 
for F18 and hoped to get a pre-release version into rawhide right after 
branching F17, but it's been almost a month now since filing the feature 
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler, 
with no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or 
request corrections) that I can see.


Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17 
preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to 
start introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day 
before feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with 
well before F18 alpha even appears on the horizon.


- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

2012-03-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:

 Hey,

 I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process
 at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze
 that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to
 get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F17, but it's
 been almost a month now since filing the feature
 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler, with
 no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or request
 corrections) that I can see.

 Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17
 preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to start
 introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day before
 feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with well before
 F18 alpha even appears on the horizon.

I don't think you need to wait for the Feature wrangler here.  Just commit it
to the master branch and build for F18.  It's not like kernel, gcc, and glibc
upgrades sit around waiting on a Feature page to get looked at.

Unless there is something that requires a large coordination with other
packages, I think you're good.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

2012-03-05 Thread Robyn Bergeron

On 03/05/2012 07:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org  wrote:

Hey,

I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process
at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze
that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to
get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F17, but it's
been almost a month now since filing the feature
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler, with
no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or request
corrections) that I can see.

Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17
preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to start
introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day before
feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with well before
F18 alpha even appears on the horizon.

Sorry, your feature wrangler has been slightly preoccupied. :)

I'll get the existing wrangler submissions reviewed/submitted for next 
week's FESCo meeting.

I don't think you need to wait for the Feature wrangler here.  Just commit it
to the master branch and build for F18.  It's not like kernel, gcc, and glibc
upgrades sit around waiting on a Feature page to get looked at.

Unless there is something that requires a large coordination with other
packages, I think you're good.

josh


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

2012-03-05 Thread Panu Matilainen

On 03/05/2012 08:14 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:

On 03/05/2012 07:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:

Hey,

I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature
process
at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze
that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and
hoped to
get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F17, but
it's
been almost a month now since filing the feature
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler,
with
no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or
request
corrections) that I can see.

Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17
preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to
start
introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day before
feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with well
before
F18 alpha even appears on the horizon.

Sorry, your feature wrangler has been slightly preoccupied. :)


Oh, no worries, so have I and it's not at all clear whether I would've 
had time to get things rolling by before now even if the feature had 
been already processed.


I had no idea what kind of entity the wrangler is :) Since it's just a 
single person, perhaps there should be a backup wrangler? I mean, we all 
get preoccupied every now and then, go on vacations etc.



I'll get the existing wrangler submissions reviewed/submitted for next
week's FESCo meeting.


Ack, thanks.

- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel