On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> Another source of Java build failures may be that the
>> javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
>> dep fragments should live; see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
* Adam Jackson [2014-06-09 12:01]:
> In the xorg-x11-docs case it's explicitly BuildRequires:
> java-1.7.0-openjdk;
Okay. Please don't do that. Use java-devel. Otherwise, this will break
on future updates to Java 8, 9 an later ones.
> changing it to plain java-devel actually fixes the
> build, p
* Peter Robinson [2014-06-09 11:35]:
> That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
> java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
> it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
>
> # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:49:05 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
> >
> > Mass rebuild stopped ? or script
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
>
> Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
Not sure what ex
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedor
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Another source of Java build failures may be that the
> javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
> dep fragments should live; see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919.
I believe that this is a documentation bu
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
> wrong in java land:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException :
> Unsuppor
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
> Neil Horman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
> > If I do so sooner rather than later,
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
> java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
> it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
>
> # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
> java-1.7.0-
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Adam Jackson"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
>>
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Jackson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
>
> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
> mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
wrong in java land:
E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman wrote:
>
>
> Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
> If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS,
> or is it too late to remove the package from F21
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
> mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
>
> You can see the current list o
Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tel
The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg.
There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump,
but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't
ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the
buildroot.
If you commit things t
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
> mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
> 'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
> increment all of them and the vers
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
> hi
> thanks for your work!
>
> now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
>
> DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
> '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
> 'groupinstall', 'srpm
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
>> in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
>> compose, and sync out to the mirrors
>>
>> The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a
>> very large number of fa
Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compo
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
26 matches
Mail list logo
