Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

2020-01-06 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 16:24:44 CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Do we really need to rebuild all thousand of packages given that most > of them are providing only noarch devel packages with sources? Don't > we need to rebuild only those which provide binaries? > We need rebuild to re-run the

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

2020-01-02 Thread Jakub Cajka
- Original Message - > From: "Igor Gnatenko" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 4:24:44 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14 > > Do we really need to rebuild

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

2020-01-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Do we really need to rebuild all thousand of packages given that most of them are providing only noarch devel packages with sources? Don't we need to rebuild only those which provide binaries? On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14

Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

2020-01-02 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.14 in Fedora 32, including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at the time of the mass

Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

2020-01-02 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.14 in Fedora 32, including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at the time of the mass