On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> > just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
> >
> > $ git push
> >
> I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
>
> $ git push
> Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the
> 'sources'
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:15 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this
> list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass
> Rebuild.
I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
build either. I
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 8:26 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> […]
> >
> > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> > commit/build.
>
> A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never
>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
[…]
>
> Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> commit/build.
A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never happened:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374
The task does not exist
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:51:36PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > I submitted
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043 Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg
> > profiles to keyfile
> >
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> I submitted
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043 Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg
> profiles to keyfile
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3044 Change: IBus 1.5.29
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3045
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:24:20PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel /
> > devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote.
> > Looks like the
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:46:19AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> > > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
> > > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed
> > > >
On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
filed
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel /
> devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote. Looks
> like the process broke down somewhere along the way.
I think it was actually a
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 21:36 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass
> > rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)?
> >
> > Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed
> > issues?
>
> I don't
* Kevin Fenzi:
> ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass
> rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)?
>
> Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed
> issues?
I don't think it matters. I raised it mainly for accuracy.
We should
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Samyak Jain:
> >
> > > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
> >
> > This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
> > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed
> > builds
> > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
> > filed shortly.
>
> Will all
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Samyak Jain:
>
> > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
>
> This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not
> included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version,
* Samyak Jain:
> - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not
included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version, glibc was
at a 2.38 pre-release (not much we can do about that given the
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
filed shortly.
Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass
rebuild and
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Please do bump and rebuild it.
It's done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103849749
> Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> commit/build.
Indeed.
___
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13:44PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
> >
> > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to
> > f39.
>
> So it's over?
Yes. "was done".
> > Things still needing rebuilding
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
>
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to
> f39.
So it's over?
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html
Is it up to the packagers to
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f39 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
Fedora Linux f39 on 2023-07-19. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux f39
for:
- No default fedora-repos-modular
- GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
- Make DNF5 The Default
- Make
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f39 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
Fedora Linux f39 on 2023-07-19. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux f39
for:
- No default fedora-repos-modular
- GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
- Make DNF5 The Default
- Make
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 09:35:26 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> > The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38):
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
> >
> > I had the usual question---should I be making
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 13:31:57 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Oh, that thing again.
> > Let me update the template so sed works correctly.
> >
>
> The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38):
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 13:31:57 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Oh, that thing again.
> Let me update the template so sed works correctly.
>
The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
I had the usual question---should I be making new
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged
when
Oh, that thing again.
Let me update the template so sed works correctly.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:28 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
> > 2023-07-19
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
> 2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
>
> This
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged
when
30 matches
Mail list logo
