Greetings.
The Fedora Notifications System, available at:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
Is a way for interested parties to be notified when events occur in
Fedora. This system currently allows for IRC and/or Email notifications
of events, as well as "digesting" a
Greetings.
The Fedora Notifications System, available at:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
Is a way for interested parties to be notified when events occur in
Fedora. This system currently allows for IRC and/or Email notifications
of events, as well as "digesting" a
Manuel Escudero wrote:
Shut up kevin...
Please watch your language. The points I'm making are very important,
telling me to be quiet (in a not very nice way) is not going to solve the
fundamental problem.
the code is opensource and you can have it if you want, you can modify
it...
The few
dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
participate instead of these few with wave account or those who paid
for it ;-)
Gerard
--
Gerard Braad — 吉拉德
Project-lead Fedora-MIPS
2010/8/29 Gerard Braad gbr...@fedoraproject.org
dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
participate instead of these few with wave account or those who paid
for it ;-)
Gerard
--
Gerard
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
2010/8/29 Gerard Braad gbr...@fedoraproject.org
dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
participate instead of these
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in
http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
NO. And Fedora Project is using it. I'm sharing a Fedora Solution an
2010/8/29 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in
http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
NO. And Fedora Project
2010/8/29 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
2010/8/29 Gerard Braad gbr...@fedoraproject.org
dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place
on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at
Manuel Escudero wrote:
We have to continue! I propouse using Google's stuff in order to have a
Standard for all desktops and maybe linux distros...
A standard relying on proprietary Google (and other) web services? No
thanks!
I called it the Fedora's Engine and is built over Google's CSE
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't they share a D-Bus API these days?
they do.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Why? Just use system dbus notifications and you're done. But as I suggested -
it
should be
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
3. keep a history of the notifications
4. max. number of notifications at the time
5. click able notifications
6. stackable notifications
I think that, at least on KDE, you really want to leave that stuff
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in
parallel to the ones already provides by the desktop environment is a
total nonstarter.
2010/8/26 Mahmoud Abdul Jawad abduljawad.mahm...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in
parallel to the ones
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
abduljawad.mahm...@gmail.com wrote:
in fact, your point means there will be two versions, KDE version
other desktops version,
Don't they share a D-Bus API these days?
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 06:26:52 pm Manuel Escudero wrote:
2010/8/24 Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through
system
notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 21:11:56 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
You'll get tons of User XY has changed status to: blah blah
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of non-
exceptional event at all. Is this enabled by default? If so, maybe we
should disable it by default in kde-settings?
afaik it's enabled by default and not only for kopete. Kopete as many
other apps
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:13:29 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of non-
exceptional event at all. Is this enabled by default? If so, maybe we
should disable it by default in kde-settings?
afaik it's enabled
after spending two days reading the two fedora mailing lists (fedora
users fedora devel), i got a list of ideas that need to be
implemented in order to keep the things up:
1. the abililty to turn off the system
2. smart notifications (maybe multilanguage, geolocation-based,
time-aware notes)
3.
2010/8/24 Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com
2010/8/24 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
You'll get tons of User XY
2010/8/25 Mika Kuusela m...@lists.mail.kapsi.fi
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:05 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote:
Now, this is the Fedora search engine:
http://ubuntuone.com/p/DuP/
I was wondering if it's possible to integrate a search box into hermes
that uses that engine as a base...
Manuel Escudero wrote:
I dont' know if it's possible to tweak the code of these apps, Or we can
use Google Gadgets as a Base,
Please don't rely on Google stuff. The native RSS plasmoid is just fine.
There's also Akregator, which is a regular KDE app to browse RSS feeds. We
don't really need
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
disabling something won't fix it, also I don't think this is that bad that
it requires extra patch to turn it off by default and diverge from
upstream
It shouldn't require a patch, just a config setting. That's what kde-
settings is for.
(But I also think the default
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
3. keep a history of the notifications
4. max. number of notifications at the time
5. click able notifications
6. stackable notifications
I think that, at least on KDE, you really want to leave that stuff to the
KNotify system, it already does all this stuff well.
On Friday, August 20, 2010 10:46:43 pm Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
Hi all,,
Hi!
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system
notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notification
like
Close your desktop, nuclear war out there (or just a security update
combined
with some steps how to fix
2010/8/24 Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through
system
notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority
notification like
Close your desktop, nuclear war out there (or just a
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.orgwrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
interfere with my
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
You'll get tons of User XY has changed status to: blah blah
Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm not sure a notification applet by itself is going to be the best
answer here... as people may be busy or not see the notice and a few
seconds later it goes away and they miss it.
That's why the notification should not time out unless/until the user clicks
it away!
In
On Monday, August 23, 2010 08:19:13 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm not sure a notification applet by itself is going to be the best
answer here... as people may be busy or not see the notice and a few
seconds later it goes away and they miss it.
That's why the notification
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:46 +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list
about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the
fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some
On 08/23/2010 02:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
A lowly user view here about popups ..
Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
interfere with my work.
All the popup notifications are annoying and
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
interfere with my work.
It gets worse. I frequently come back to a desktop on which my
girlfriend
2010/8/23 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
users?
Or were you expecting other types of
On 08/23/2010 01:54 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
b) Let's test it first in Fedora and see how it goes, my idea was having
a notification system that let the user Choose between what kind of news
they wanna recieve in some part of the instalation process (trough
anaconda) so
if they want the
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
users?
Or were you expecting
On 08/24/2010 03:55 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Right. So the problem is to not actually break PackageKit's notification
system, not to add blue tack and scotch tape on top of it.
The proposed solution is not just for package update issues but for
general announcements that are of importance to
be nice to talk with
him (btw, check the wiki page history to know who added that link).
i was talking about a Fedora Notifications System, not a googlewave
discussion.
after a half a day, i didn't get any feedbacks.
again, if you have any idea to improve the application please post
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:19:53PM +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
without help i'll not be able to continue.
please test the application on non-KDE desktops, think for improvements
give feedbacks.
Maybe you get more feedback if you make it a F15 feature:
1) I was the one who put a google wave link in the wiki, I tought it might
be a good way of comunication because anyone with a Gmail account can acess
to a wave and use it. If someone do not have a Gmail account he/she simply
can use the IRC, can contact anyone that's helping via their
2010/8/22 Till Maas opensou...@till.name
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:19:53PM +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
without help i'll not be able to continue.
please test the application on non-KDE desktops, think for improvements
give feedbacks.
Maybe you get more feedback if you make it a
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:46:43 +0400
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad abduljawad.mahm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list
about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the
fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is).
after some
with
him (btw, check the wiki page history to know who added that link).
i was talking about a Fedora Notifications System, not a googlewave
discussion.
after a half a day, i didn't get any feedbacks.
again, if you have any idea to improve the application please post it,
if you found anything
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines putted them on the
wiki:
On 08/21/2010 02:16 AM, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines
You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
is problematic for two reasons:
a) Google Wave is dead
b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
Rahul
a) you're a troll
b) you're a troll
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
is problematic for two reasons:
a) Google Wave is dead
b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
Rahul
a) you're a
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
is problematic for two reasons:
a) Google Wave is dead
b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Nevertheless, imho it should not be used to develop infrastructure for Fedora,
because people involved in Fedora might not want to use it, because it is not
FOSS.
The less-than-clear-future roadmap for Wave as a service
51 matches
Mail list logo
