On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 21:05 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's correct. This is frankly a 'realistic' decision, on the basis
that the PackageKit maintainer believes updating packages should be
allowed for a
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
What happened to 'ask the first time, and at the same time ask to change
the policy to make this action permitted without authentication'?
PolicyKit dropped support for that. :-(
IMO that's the right way. Either the user will be nagged *once*, or else
they have said
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's correct. This is frankly a 'realistic' decision, on the basis
that the PackageKit maintainer believes updating packages should be
allowed for a regular user by default and intends to implement this, and
I don't want to dictate
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 19:42 +0100, Davide Cescato wrote:
I just noticed that updating an already installed package no longer is
on the list of actions requiring administrative privileges. This was not
the case in earlier versions of the policy, which I found correct. The
change entered the
I have now adjusted the draft -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_privilege_escalation_policy
- to reflect all feedback
from this list and from FESco. It will be reviewed again by FESco
next week.
Please raise any potential issues or further suggestions for
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 12:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I have now adjusted the draft -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_privilege_escalation_policy
- to reflect all feedback from this list and from FESco. It will be reviewed
again by FESco next week. Please raise
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Tony Nelson
tonynel...@georgeanelson.com wrote:
On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who
suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists
before it gets approved.
I have now
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 05:19:59PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who
suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists
before it gets approved.
I have now adjusted the
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:48:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I have now adjusted the draft -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_privilege_escalation_policy
- to reflect all feedback from this list and from FESco. It will be reviewed
again by FESco next week.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 05:19:59PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who
suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing
Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who suggested
some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists before it gets
approved.
I have now adjusted the draft -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_privilege_escalation_policy
- to reflect all feedback
On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who
suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists
before it gets approved.
I have now adjusted the draft -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/
12 matches
Mail list logo
