Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Finished! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5664056 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5664100 Thank you all. - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR8+MMAAoJED2vIvfUANbEs28QAMzrp2xPja1ELZGYWKvSnnN5 wE8Gzgc0OVajwQoBxAb1QYrbfKeQUufcLublm+VWMPGGpHyTNXIpITbntiTKi3PX 12YENMpbLrcisiVA0mhDa4kLmIUxPamG/PGh2qDEM4UzEKY5wDvIiowDonVUL+EL jDs0UzePwmFY2Fo/VDpixGv/pN2TQLV3HrnJTubdMXUV2Q92oJ2dV1x31Ojh/kjh 8aXmDs53H/3mITA6ET64NGLyYaqRhkucFAijSe3Ym9brOKuK5DGmaYa4wWW4B+z1 hrENM1k6oxb2n8ZYWFL1VjKq8Avpwt7qlyMEWPCdhhM6clQrIIN7UUKjG8Ia/x+7 ReKYEC++H1hn+CVxFDKSPsY7E30hFOPqUrkcnv/oySFvu1819HICgzb0rqheOtPv LVFmF/aGfg/tlcirwLGj6sbzpggknXHWQXWbaMsmnMAjTG6hNsPcVyUSuC4/ERug zWJBjYvN/qv8sZiJO/0ErJgVN9fbDuvKiSpNxUa1jWyw6WcJdB3zsN0MPDFvOMcE WdagWOfIJvOh8mwcVeINNw/vjg128Tu/zWz3BLX9tqkXtHuVvtbdKWlzASAA/FFG 1Q6Ahi1p13K8KDx/t5mE3GeA+7uT0Wd7lsjikifEzT/kKAVGJh10JahHdjgzepwU GQi063JzudaqLTafEKK0 =MrrI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2013 01:10 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
What does mean serial mode ? :)
MUMPS.mod.spec appears good. I would use the environment variables
($MPI_LIB and $MPI_INCLUDE) after module load mpi but the
definitions should be good enough.
About what is serial mode, you should refactor MUMPS.spec to also
make a build with openmpi disabled. Should do two builds in
MUMPS.spec, and install the build that does not need module load
mpi to work installed in %{_libdir}, and the one that needs,
installed in $MPI_LIB
Hi Paulo.
Good to hear from you again. :)
Hi T.C.
Yes, but usually examples are shipped in /usr/share/doc via %doc,
not directly in /usr/share.
'examples' directory contains arch dependent programs, I can't
packaging them in /usr/share.
This .spec should be fine:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod2.spec
- --
-
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=jTVj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
On 7/26/13, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
'examples' directory contains arch dependent programs, I can't
packaging them in /usr/share.
In that case you could consider shipping them in an -examples
subpackage if most consumers of the main package won't find them
useful. Also, you could use %{_libexecdir} if you want the paths to
these binaries to be the same on 32 and 64 bit systems. Both are
optional though.
This .spec should be fine:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod2.spec
The -common subpackage should be BuildArch: noarch but otherwise it
looks good.
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2013 06:56 PM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: On 24/07/13 05:04 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e. no MPI], if it is supported by upstream. What does mean serial mode ? :) Serial in this case means non-parallel, running without MPI. Regards, Dariusz Thank you Dariusz. Do you think new .spec file is already suitable ? - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR8SflAAoJED2vIvfUANbE+rYQALeLM/7mYxqmPI9/mh8zC/ND AGgZz/owkUSG8EkaPTqRVzPTEQAo0mSbDx0dllt2FDwNPJ7BV1buWU40GD48GNBY fQyZEcD1DDazTgXXgIMZ+dmOqpTrmPQT7PwKdlyqSfp3KxI9dvJDHP3x2BKGzkSP eEm3UbKiKY7w0qnacz22LIp6bV0J7xq4JRy0NEwImoX5s8jl8Duuz/CCSuBXDnFe /3kQW+7plrVvM+10zW5HFhjzaO//fDxvZci2yqX4LPX+P7mjexAeGpeOty4D/zvj +4zPCBlnw5KHvRTHV9OrdGfRKKhdpOfG4i5LhCM03jHejCwW6xQFqE37Jd6YGtiC ZQn6MMzLdNC+rahFK4vCjoIc46adcnx4vt8JJ0F/erni63NZ8NEFIsj8L8GTkx1Z P9ld32HSwPLthunW3Lrv/c+LIkkrV/FzlWPZQIcHK4Owo9/beISwa0K7YfFajIm/ 1Dy3dOUp+lQ2EOumMIi1uta1gbf7DIxRfmGevFxedLfCG3lB4YjPCaI5v7etzQ0k wf1PNq3woQPEXwfm+t+jO0DXMFJmNH7g5lRiGnLCO5fZUpS3hjWT1MNpP3OJZc6x DB1YvY/YYP7dAU8NWRUe0q269Djm/I4HJ7G3S7gWJXTzOQU3nLS9N1H5MbAeK2sp ZAp/hp4T6hw4OAxDJTSx =tHA5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
Hi all.
I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI
packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I
have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some
suggestions.
This is initial .spec file of MUMPS:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/MUMPS.git/tree/MUMPS.spec
This is that adjusted according to the MPI packaging guidelines:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod.spec
As you see, I have created the packages
- - MUMPS-openmpi
- - MUMPS-openmpi-devel
- - MUMPS-common
Upstream provides illustrative test programs showing how MUMPS can be
used in examples/ directory; Can I package these programs in
'MUMPS-common' package ? They are located in dedicated directory in
/usr/share.
'MUMPS-openmpi' contains all versioned libraries; I don't know if it's
correct or the package must be named 'MUMPS-openmpi-libs'
Should all .h files be in a '-headers' subpackage ?
Now, they are 'MUMPS-openmpi-devel'.
This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me:
Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e.
no MPI], if it is supported by upstream.
What does mean serial mode ? :)
MUMPS.mod.spec appears good. I would use the environment variables
($MPI_LIB and $MPI_INCLUDE) after module load mpi but the definitions
should be good enough.
About what is serial mode, you should refactor MUMPS.spec to also make
a build with openmpi disabled. Should do two builds in MUMPS.spec, and
install the build that does not need module load mpi to work installed in
%{_libdir}, and the one that needs, installed in $MPI_LIB
-
Antonio Trande
Paulo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
Hi! On Jul 24, 2013 9:04 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some suggestions. This is initial .spec file of MUMPS: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/MUMPS.git/tree/MUMPS.spec This is that adjusted according to the MPI packaging guidelines: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod.spec As you see, I have created the packages - - MUMPS-openmpi - - MUMPS-openmpi-devel - - MUMPS-common Upstream provides illustrative test programs showing how MUMPS can be used in examples/ directory; Can I package these programs in 'MUMPS-common' package ? They are located in dedicated directory in /usr/share. Yes, but usually examples are shipped in /usr/share/doc via %doc, not directly in /usr/share. 'MUMPS-openmpi' contains all versioned libraries; I don't know if it's correct or the package must be named 'MUMPS-openmpi-libs' No, a -libs subpackage would only be necessary if the main MUMPS-openmpi package contained more than libraries. Should all .h files be in a '-headers' subpackage ? Now, they are 'MUMPS-openmpi-devel'. No, -devel is the correct location for the headers. This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e. no MPI], if it is supported by upstream. What does mean serial mode ? :) -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Following MPI packaging guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some suggestions. This is initial .spec file of MUMPS: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/MUMPS.git/tree/MUMPS.spec This is that adjusted according to the MPI packaging guidelines: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod.spec As you see, I have created the packages - - MUMPS-openmpi - - MUMPS-openmpi-devel - - MUMPS-common Upstream provides illustrative test programs showing how MUMPS can be used in examples/ directory; Can I package these programs in 'MUMPS-common' package ? They are located in dedicated directory in /usr/share. 'MUMPS-openmpi' contains all versioned libraries; I don't know if it's correct or the package must be named 'MUMPS-openmpi-libs' Should all .h files be in a '-headers' subpackage ? Now, they are 'MUMPS-openmpi-devel'. This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e. no MPI], if it is supported by upstream. What does mean serial mode ? :) - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR7/rqAAoJED2vIvfUANbEKJIP/iaaHVdWkxrnVd+4CtbKPFU3 4LqdPNFuUMpzlsdNIyAPhkKnGHZiLTFoLg9kWOMw+SnM7gVhfHg5j081a/4io61k DiJhpoCOBHqoMM1RMYjII3bL07+N+VTliFo6MW7dVKTG2LUE47A/nC49P1cM77UN vh7pfLjc4F8sIrQO5ic3cxjT3s9+xpdbu+6ojNruwChomK47bY2AV9pzgRZUu76r Felx9hXZp10RsVegKB4SxjUqmxQi65scF71e2xBHKN82uPxO0a+ifNbfJjh9PZk/ YWXDjuABwtzJgRYW8alSJn/DAjnMHVyQJHzVynSmGsfWy6ffP3BSf8+kJk2TwvLs 7Mtue7DG/NAa08DYJWFAI/8lA8dvGx0NG1kPAFce0EOv+O0mCckOrQ78Vb50OG93 E0jkpib9at3DLz3iAVF5Sez9nzF0jKmo7MXuv0eCsYG22yYPoNjTSDo/6hEtxk9s HkV6Cr05S5tvT2VZp6KsVJs9bTCSrr39EFKhYz4fZO/qNY3WLN5PVhFMuu9mU+6H 37LqipT8GDQfneNAGF7yShQJxIe53hBnWSem/RnhcwXpWmYIILiKlBhNNEErOKUa buwUqaT8CxWjzZZZEb8dKE5ndt40N87fRkhdi8vaNxeNMRi8VWpjESsVSBPMlzdX vW+uGyYBIUH7QSYoYIDc =5kU6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines
On 24/07/13 05:04 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e. no MPI], if it is supported by upstream. What does mean serial mode ? :) Serial in this case means non-parallel, running without MPI. Regards, Dariusz -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
