Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 16/01/13 21:40, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Stahl writes: >> read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against >> different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and >> the newer jpeg8. > > [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them no matter w

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Stahl writes: > read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against > different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and > the newer jpeg8. [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them no matter what. But the bigger point is that we can't l

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >>> I hope other distributions don't use that release. >> >> FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 from source already to get a >> certain binary [

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: > > > >> Another interesting thread is > >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453 > >> > >> We are currently discussin

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: > >> Another interesting thread is >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453 >> >> We are currently discussing drop of the >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-15 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: > Another interesting thread is > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453 > > We are currently discussing drop of the > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI feature > because > SmartScale encoding (only re

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-15 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:42:59PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > hi, > > As Fedora was pioneering in the libjpeg-turbo inclusion > maybe you are interested in this discussion. > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=50E4AF86.50203%40users.sourceforge.net&forum_name=libjp

Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-14 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
hi, As Fedora was pioneering in the libjpeg-turbo inclusion maybe you are interested in this discussion. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=50E4AF86.50203%40users.sourceforge.net&forum_name=libjpeg-turbo-users Original Message Subject: [Libjpeg-turbo-users