Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-18 Thread Frederic Berat
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:07 AM John Reiser wrote: > > On 1/17/23 14:37, Björn Persson wrote: > > > So as things stand, these rebuilds need to be done by a human who knows > > the dependency graph. > > Requiring "a human who knows the dependency graph" is *severely* broken. > There should be a

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread John Reiser
On 1/17/23 14:37, Björn Persson wrote: So as things stand, these rebuilds need to be done by a human who knows the dependency graph. Requiring "a human who knows the dependency graph" is *severely* broken. There should be a shell script which computes an acceptable order from the old

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Björn Persson
Pavel Zhukov wrote: > Yes, that happens every year because of koji limitation. > Ada rebuild is not just mass-rebuild thing. > Because of circular dependencies: gprbuild buildrequires xmlada and > xmlada build requires gprbuild and both of them requires > gcc-gnat.so. they were built with >

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Pavel Zhukov
Fabio Valentini writes: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still >> > being voted about by FESCo. >> > >> > Apparently, the following

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:24:16PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still > > > being voted about by FESCo. > > > > > > Apparently, the

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Björn Persson
Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still > > being voted about by FESCo. > > > > Apparently, the following packages now don't install: > > There is a mass rebuild tomorrow.

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still > > being voted about by FESCo. > > > > Apparently, the following packages now don't install: > >

Re: GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still > being voted about by FESCo. > > Apparently, the following packages now don't install: There is a mass rebuild tomorrow. The Ada soname changes every year

GCC 13 broke 50 packages requiring libgnat-12.so() and libgnarl-12.so()

2023-01-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still being voted about by FESCo. Apparently, the following packages now don't install: $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libgnat-12.so()(64bit)' --whatrequires 'libgnarl-12.so()(64bit)'