On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that we're calling killall -TERM instead of killall -HUP in the patch.
That seems non-optimal (since it means we'll keep shutting down the gconfd
server instead of letting it use it's 30second timeout)
That's
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:56:27AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that we're calling killall -TERM instead of killall -HUP in the patch.
That seems non-optimal (since it means we'll keep shutting down the gconfd
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:04 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm a bit unclear on the original problem report, actually. In
addition to
what you've said, the report also says that the user had to logout and
log
back in before it worked. That seems like a different symptom. 30
seconds
is not
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
(Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
%posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
%a bug that won't be fixed in some versions of Fedora I'll add the killall
%to the
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 12:26:17PM +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
(Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
%posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
%a bug that won't be
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 20:44 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Hi,
Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
If the user restart X/the
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed,
yes. Note though we should really only be doing this once at the end
of a transaction when installation is
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:38:45AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed,
yes. Note though we should really
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:38:45AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:38 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed,
yes. Note though we should really only be
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:15:20PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:38:45AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:59:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:38 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Running makefile-install-schema and makefile-uninstall-schema eventually
calls do_sync() which was supposed to reread the schemas. That's currently
calling gconf_engine_suggest_sync() in gconf.c and I'm not sure whether
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:37:20PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Running makefile-install-schema and makefile-uninstall-schema eventually
calls do_sync() which was supposed to reread the schemas. That's currently
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 17:25 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I remember panu and ffesti were exploring ideas in the area of autodetecting
types of files that were installed and running scripts based on that but
I don't know what they've found.
Link? This is an idea I have been meaning to push as
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Something like this:
%posttrans
killall -HUP gconfd-2 /dev/null || :
You might want to switch to using the macros documented here at the
same
time::
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf
I have
Hi,
Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
If the user restart X/the computer, the bug does not appear at all.
I am therefore quite
17 matches
Mail list logo
