Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > > are not sent anymore even for R

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "b

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10. 11. 19 18:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > >> are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big los

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > > are not sent anymore even for Ra

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On 10. 11. 19 18:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were usef

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. > > If you think that the weekly "brok

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were useful, I could set that up again. After all, I

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 17:10 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > > timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not > > optimal. > > I'm not familiar with

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. Vít Dne 06. 11. 19 v 21:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > Hello, > > it repeatedly happened to me that I'm notified by Koschei that dozens > of my packages suddenly fail t

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On 07. 11. 19 16:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 2

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wro

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of prob

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > >> timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not optimal. I'm not familiar with an existing solution to this

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not > optimal. I'm not familiar with an existing solution to this problem, but I agree that it is not op

Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

Hello, it repeatedly happened to me that I'm notified by Koschei that dozens of my packages suddenly fail to resolve build dependencies on a released Fedora. I usually find out that the broken update was sitting in testing for 7 days without any feedback, only to be pushed and receive ex-post