Re: HAL status

2010-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ben Boeckel wrote: With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of completely replacing HAL? For KDE, according to upstream, we need to wait for at least 4.5, but more likely 4.6. (Hopefully it will not end up being even longer, like for Akonadi which will only finally

Re: HAL status

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 April 2010 20:55, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote: The wiki states that pm-utils is hal-free. Maybe the hard dep in the RPM needs looked at? Ajax discovered that it pokes HAL in at least two places. We're waiting for an upstream fix in the meantime. Richard. -- devel mailing list

Re: HAL status

2010-04-18 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 22:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: Hi, With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined to replace it, but since I

Re: HAL status

2010-04-18 Thread Ben Boeckel
In article 1271556200.29034.1.ca...@localhost you wrote: On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: Hi, With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined to replace it, but since I run a

Re: HAL status

2010-04-17 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: Hi, With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined to replace it, but since I run a tight setup and HAL is not in the Minimal install on the

HAL status

2010-04-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
Hi, With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined to replace it, but since I run a tight setup and HAL is not in the Minimal install on the F-13 media, I was wondering when a setup completely without