Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-29 Thread Florian Weimer
On 07/28/2014 10:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto: No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-29 Thread Matthias Runge
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:43:14AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump, deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11. Thank you. I noticed, you're a bit quick in pushing updates to stable releases. When pushing to older

HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi, As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname manually: libjson-c.so.2.0.1-libjson-c.so.3.0.0 Potentially affected:

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP - please REVERT

2014-07-28 Thread Remi Collet
Le 28/07/2014 14:53, Christopher Meng a écrit : Hi, As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname manually: Please consider reverting to 0.11 in

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname manually I'm sorry, wat???

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:36:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable releases (was it?), Two updates have been filed hours ago, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname manually:

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Peter Robinson
If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable releases (was it?), Two updates have been filed hours ago, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.el6 and it seems the upgrade has not

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Remi Collet
Le 28/07/2014 16:03, Peter Robinson a écrit : If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable releases (was it?), Two updates have been filed hours ago, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname manually:

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Miloslav Trmač
- Original Message - On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 12:02 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: - Original Message - On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json 0.11-0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from now

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:02:24 -0400 (EDT), Miloslav Trmač wrote: If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having to continue to patch it. IIRC we do have various packages that have to do this.

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto: No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having to continue to patch it. IIRC we do have

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi all, Thanks for your comment. Those 2 updates was already canceled yesterday as I've realized the problem after Sandro's bug report. TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump, deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11. It's tricky now. 1. Upstream