Hi,
On 02/21/2010 02:15 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
==
[...]
Broken packages in fedora-12-x86_64:
monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.1.0-1.fc12.i686 requires
Hi,
On 02/21/2010 02:15 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
==
Broken packages in fedora-updates-12-i386:
mono-moonlight-2.4.3.1-1.fc12.i686 requires mono-core =
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
linuxwacom
Should be fixed in xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.4-4.fc13 .
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 04:16 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
avant-window-navigator doesn't have broken deps, this error occurred
because the F12 package had a higher release version.
Perhaps yum should deal with this better i.e take dist tag into account
It does take it into account, exactly as it
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 15:21 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I can do this; but I don't understand why the existence of
libopenvrml-devel and its Obsoletes: openvrml-devel aren't sufficient.
This isn't the reason, but as a general note, unversioned obsoletes are
almost always a bad idea, as they
2010/2/21 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
Just for kicks, the current
Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages
that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade
paths and bad/missing
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:16:20 +
Leigh Scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com wrote:
avant-window-navigator doesn't have broken deps, this error occurred
because the F12 package had a higher release version.
Perhaps yum should deal with this better i.e take dist tag into
account
Release trumps
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:46:14 -0500, Braden wrote:
Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages
that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade
paths and bad/missing Obsoletes for old
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 19:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:46:14 -0500, Braden wrote:
Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages
that have been removed in 13, some are likely due
On Saturday 20 February 2010 08:34:39 pm Braden McDaniel wrote:
(portions snipped)
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:20 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
...
I'm happy to fix it if I can figure out what's broken.
...
That's not it.
...
Also not it.
...
Nope.
I think that's everything. Let me
10 matches
Mail list logo
