On 01/14/2015 05:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43:46PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah I just delete those mails now days. Its just spam F19 is EOL is
not news that I need to get 1000 times.
Right, clearly, that message is not really for _you_.
Really?
It's for the
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:23:06 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
I would just open a FESCo ticket to get the package removed from Fedora.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1388
Much more interesting would be to learn whether anyone has any ideas on how
to prevent such issues in the future. The
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:59:18 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/14/2015 05:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43:46PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah I just delete those mails now days. Its just spam F19 is EOL is
not news that I need to get 1000 times.
Right, clearly,
On So, 2015-01-10 at 12:54 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Big *sigh*.
Guys, this is not funny anymore. Almost as if some people at Fedora try to
test how long one can keep one's temper. Well, this is embarrasing and not
casting a positive light on the Fedora Project package collection:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43:46PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah I just delete those mails now days. Its just spam F19 is EOL is
not news that I need to get 1000 times.
Right, clearly, that message is not really for _you_. It's for the
people who reported the bug.
--
Matthew Miller
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:23:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* Last upstream release is from 2007 and the same as offered by Fedora.
Then it's not the Fedora maintainer who is not doing his/her job.
At Fedora, it is _mispackaged_ and untested to begin with. The plugin
packages likely have never
- Original Message -
It has happened again. :-/
| This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora
| has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is
| Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no
| longer maintained.
|
|
Michael Schwendt wrote:
* Last upstream release is from 2007 and the same as offered by Fedora.
Then it's not the Fedora maintainer who is not doing his/her job.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2015-01-10, 11:54 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Guys, this is not funny anymore. Almost as if some people at
Fedora try to
test how long one can keep one's temper. Well, this is embarrasing and not
casting a positive light on the Fedora Project package collection:
I would just go ahead
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:54:27PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Big *sigh*.
Guys, this is not funny anymore. Almost as if some people at Fedora try to
test how long one can keep one's temper. Well, this is embarrasing and not
casting a positive light on the Fedora Project package
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
It has happened again. :-/
| This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora
| has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is
| Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from
Big *sigh*.
Guys, this is not funny anymore. Almost as if some people at Fedora try to
test how long one can keep one's temper. Well, this is embarrasing and not
casting a positive light on the Fedora Project package collection:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/460557
Package and software are in
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:44:39 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
I would just go ahead with
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
As much sense as this procedure may make in _some_ cases, it has been a
failure for other packagers before. They emerge only to end the
It has happened again. :-/
| This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora
| has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is
| Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no
| longer maintained.
|
| [...]
As I found it odd, that
14 matches
Mail list logo
