On 08/24/2017 05:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I was going to look at f25/f26 for a 6.x update, but I haven't had any
> time to get to it. ;( Would need a bunch of rebuilds and waiting in
> testing a while so 3rd parties could see it and rebuild at the very least.
I think we're going to need an ABI
On 08/24/2017 08:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:12 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
>> Le 24/08/2017 à 08:58, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 06:44 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit :
> The soname bump requires
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:12 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 24/08/2017 à 08:58, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 06:44 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > > Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit :
> > >
> > > > The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt,
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:32:02 AM CEST Moez Roy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to
> >
> > build:
> > autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm
> >
Le 24/08/2017 à 08:58, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 06:44 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
>> Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit :
>>
>>> The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so
>>> I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9.
>>
>>
>> Such a version bump
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 06:44 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit :
>
> > The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so
> > I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9.
>
>
> Such a version bump in stable branch is not acceptable.
>
> ImageMagick
Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit :
> The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so
> I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9.
Such a version bump in stable branch is not acceptable.
ImageMagick 7 removed lot of functions (deprecated in v6)
Especially as
On 08/23/2017 07:32 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so I
updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9.
I tagged this update now for Updates Testing for f25 & f26 as it is an urgent
fix.
It is also in build root override so affected packages can
On 08/23/2017 07:32 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so I
updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9.
I tagged this update now for Updates Testing for f25 & f26 as it is an urgent
fix.
It is also in build root override so affected packages
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to
> build:
>
> autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm
> converseen-0.9.6.2-1.fc27.src.rpm
> dmtx-utils-0.7.4-2.fc27.src.rpm
>
Le 27/07/2017 à 11:18, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> WTF - "Image Tragick" is still not fixed in Fedora?
> can someone please port php-pecl-imagick to GraphicsMagick
php-pecl-gmagick already exists ;)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 08/01/2017 04:13 AM:
ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to
build:
F rubygem-rmagick-2.16.0-3.fc26.src.rpm
Fixed on rawhide.
Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list --
ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to
build:
autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm
converseen-0.9.6.2-1.fc27.src.rpm
dmtx-utils-0.7.4-2.fc27.src.rpm
drawtiming-0.7.1-20.fc26.src.rpm
F gtatool-2.2.0-4.fc27.src.rpm
imageinfo-0.05-25.fc26.src.rpm
On 07/29/2017 12:07 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
Hopefully I got all the CVE's
On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
>>>
>>> Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog.
>>> If someone wants to check over and make sure I
On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
>>
>> Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog.
>> If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were
>> fixed in the 6.x
Am 28.07.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog.
If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were
fixed in the 6.x branch that would
On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog.
If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were
fixed in the 6.x branch that would be great.
I'd like to let it run a few days in
ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog.
If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were
fixed in the 6.x branch that would be great.
I'd like to let it run a few days in rawhide before updating stable
branches, just in
On 07/27/2017 10:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Ouch.
>
> Since the unresponsive maintainer process takes some time, could a
> provenpackager please update ImageMagick while we wait for this to go
> through?
I can try and update to the latest 6.x version... but looks like 7.x
changes api and
On 27 July 2017 at 13:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On 27 July 2017 at 13:11, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
>> Ouch.
>>
>> Since the unresponsive maintainer process takes some time, could a
>> provenpackager please update ImageMagick while we
On 27 July 2017 at 13:11, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Ouch.
>
> Since the unresponsive maintainer process takes some time, could a
> provenpackager please update ImageMagick while we wait for this to go
> through?
>
> It is a serious oversight that our security process
Ouch.
Since the unresponsive maintainer process takes some time, could a
provenpackager please update ImageMagick while we wait for this to go
through?
It is a serious oversight that our security process can fail like this
for such a major package when the maintainer is not watching
ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)
Sources were last updated 2016-01-06 13:43:26 -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=425
Since then there have been numerous security vulnerabilities including
ImageTragick.
I commented here:
https
25 matches
Mail list logo