Re: Insane results from mock "rawhide" build

2012-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:21:05 -0400
Tom Lane  wrote:

> Jesse Keating  writes:
> > On 08/02/2012 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I just did
> >> 
> >> /usr/bin/mock -r
> >> fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm
> 
> > Check and see what repo url is in that config file, and see what it 
> > resolves to when in use?
> 
> I did another rm -rf /var/cache/mock/* and tried again a couple hours
> ago, and got a sane-looking package set.  So I don't know what the
> heck happened last night.  It was shortly after somebody on the fedora
> infrastructure team had broken and repaired lookaside-cache downloads,
> though, so maybe there was some lingering effect of that.

Shouldn't be. The lookaside is for source used to do builds, nothing to
do with the rpm repositories themselves. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Insane results from mock "rawhide" build

2012-08-03 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating  writes:
> On 08/02/2012 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I just did
>> 
>> /usr/bin/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm

> Check and see what repo url is in that config file, and see what it 
> resolves to when in use?

I did another rm -rf /var/cache/mock/* and tried again a couple hours
ago, and got a sane-looking package set.  So I don't know what the heck
happened last night.  It was shortly after somebody on the fedora
infrastructure team had broken and repaired lookaside-cache downloads,
though, so maybe there was some lingering effect of that.

regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Insane results from mock "rawhide" build

2012-08-02 Thread Tom Lane
I just did

/usr/bin/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm

after having flushed /var/cache/mock, so that current packages would get
pulled down.  Or so I thought.  When the build failed and I went to find
out why, I discovered that it had supplied me with an ancient libtiff:

DEBUG util.py:257:   libtiff-devel  x86_64   3.9.5-2.fc17   
 fedora   451 k
DEBUG util.py:257:   libtiffx86_64   3.9.5-2.fc17   
 fedora   136 k

That version of the package was obsoleted in April, not only in rawhide
but F17 as well, so WTF?  Where is mock pulling this from?

(The other packages it grabbed seem to be an assortment of mostly fc17
and a few fc18 builds; didn't really check dates on the others, but for
sure this is not a post-mass-rebuild package set.)

regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel