On Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:15:19 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and
> > that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive.
> >
> I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client
On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and
> that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive.
>
I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client providing the libpq
library. It's symmetric to postgresql-server name.
--
While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and
that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive.
V.
Dne 29.8.2018 v 15:36 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> ad [1] tracker - it's a good time to warn about this (rather
> non-intrusive, I believe) change
Hi all,
ad [1] tracker - it's a good time to warn about this (rather
non-intrusive, I believe) change in PostgreSQL packaging in Fedora,
expected to happen in F30.
We'd like to provide alternative versions of PostgreSQL servers in
Fedora's modular repo, but still - it is very much desirable to
