Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It might make some sense to have a separate repo for the lastest kernels on released versions of Fedora. Maybe one than one, since some people may be willing to test RCs and other people just want to get a jump on trying

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-09 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/09/2012 07:24 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: a concern over the debug opt Alternatively - just build it without debugging - download the source rpm(s). After installing/setting up the rpm tools, unpack (rpm -iv) the source rpm in ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS dir - then go to ~/rpmbuild/SPEC and do:

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-09 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/09/2012 09:38 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: On 01/09/2012 07:24 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: a concern over the debug opt Alternatively - just build it without debugging - download the source rpm(s). ... Of course (should go without saying ... but) the obvious downside to the speed

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:24:48 -0500, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: If there's a concern over the debug options in the rawhide kernel being enabled (which would be ironic, considering we're talking about getting advanced testing and debug), the kernel team is going to build one

Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Bojan Smojver
Given this: https://plus.google.com/109995262342451767357/posts/FzpWWo4sRip Would it be possible to get a 3.2 build for F-16, so that we can start testing? -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:57:26 +1100 Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: Given this: https://plus.google.com/109995262342451767357/posts/FzpWWo4sRip Would it be possible to get a 3.2 build for F-16, so that we can start testing? The rawhide/F17 build works fine on f16 (at least as far

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:57:26 +1100 Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: Given this: https://plus.google.com/109995262342451767357/posts/FzpWWo4sRip Would it be possible to get a 3.2 build for F-16, so that we can start

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 08:57 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: Would it be possible to get a 3.2 build for F-16, so that we can start testing? I'm going to reply to my own message here, to keep the thread, but it is really in reply to the other two messages, which I don't have in my mailbox right now

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 14:55:58 +1100, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: I was thinking more along the lines of: - an official updates-testing build is more likely to reach more people (it is great that that Rawhide build works, but not many will try it like that) You really

Re: Kernel 3.1 being phased out, time for 3.2 in F-16?

2012-01-08 Thread Bojan Smojver
--- Original message --- From: Bruno Wolff III You really can't do that the way things are now. That would block doing updates to the current (in updates) kernel that are needed. Good point. Didn't think of that, to be honest. OK, never mind. Bad plan. -- Bojan -- devel mailing