On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:33:34PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
# ldd /usr/bin/msntest | wc -l
20
# ldd /usr/lib64/libmsn.so.0.3.0 | wc -l
9
Please, be careful. ldd(1) prints recursively all dependencies.
$ ldd /usr/bin/msntest | wc -l
20
$ readelf -a
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:46 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
Yes, typical problem is (usually) completely broken .pc (pkg-config)
file. My experience is that developers don't have a clue about
'Requires.private' pkg-config field and they add all libraries to
'Requires' or 'Libs', so then binaries are
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 21:36 +, John5342 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example,
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes applications
in
them, so I wrote a small shell script:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
On my F16 installation, it finds around 60 packages that are libraries with
applications. I'd like to ask if
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
them, so I wrote a small shell script:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
That just checks for a path. It
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in them, so I wrote a small shell script:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:26:09 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
If you install BOTH the 64-bit and 32-bit packages, the 64-bit version (on
all the platforms where 64-bit is
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
If you install BOTH the 64-bit and
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
- the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:33:34PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
Does anybody know of anything I can try in Fedora 16 to get the other half
of my files from the Deja DUP backup?
Thanks,
Richard
On Nov 20, 2011 7:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
them, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
