On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:26 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.05.19 um 17:23 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz:
> > Based on your example, yes:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/
> >
> > "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of
Am 19.05.19 um 17:23 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz:
> Based on your example, yes:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/
>
> "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the
> *binary* rpm."
Thank you - somehow I missed that part.
Felix
On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 17:15 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> I have a question regarding license tags in spec files for software under
> multiple licenses (bundled libraries):
> - The main software is licensed under a 3-clause BSD.
> - The software bundles a library under ASL 2 in subfolder /foo
>
>
I have a question regarding license tags in spec files for software under
multiple licenses (bundled libraries):
- The main software is licensed under a 3-clause BSD.
- The software bundles a library under ASL 2 in subfolder /foo
As far as I know the correct license tag for the Fedora package is
