08.07.2010 00:29, Tom spot Callaway пишет:
Hello Fedora!
Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
Upon the advice of Red Hat Legal, we have slightly amended the Fedora
Licensing Guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines). The
On 7/7/2010 4:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[orion] apache-commons-jexl: apache-commons-jexl-javadoc-2.0.1-1.fc14.noarch
Added license to javadoc package
[orion] BareBonesBrowserLaunch:
BareBonesBrowserLaunch-javadoc-3.0-1.fc14.noarch
Package is public domain and does not ship a license
On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 07/26/2010 07:25 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files
into a
On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what
the best way to
2010/7/27 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I
On 07/26/2010 02:53 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/7/27 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
I am a
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files
into a new xen-licenses package (I don't what to include that many files
twice). I haven't built it yet as
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what
the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a
Hi,
[richardfearn] findbugs-bcel: findbugs-bcel-javadoc-5.2-1.3.8.fc12.1.x86_64
findbugs-bcel and findbugs-bcel-javadoc can be installed
independently, so I've added licence files to the -javadoc subpackage.
Thanks for your work!
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:44 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
- Generating debuginfo packages that match up to subpackages as
opposed to being catch-all super packages.
There is a bug for this; I would welcome anyone with the power to reopen
it:
On 07/18/2010 11:23 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:44 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
- Generating debuginfo packages that match up to subpackages as
opposed to being catch-all super packages.
There is a bug for this; I would welcome anyone with the power to
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[ndim] nted: nted-doc-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch
nted-ntedfont-fonts-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch
Fixed in nted-1.10.12-2.fc14.
[ndim] simulavr: simulavr-doc-0.1.2.6-6.fc13.noarch
Fixed in simulavr-0.1.2.6-7.fc14.
[ndim] terminus-fonts:
On 7 July 2010 21:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[jgu] emacs-auctex: tex-preview-11.86-2.fc14.noarch
emacs-auctex-doc-11.86-2.fc14.noarch
Fixed in rawhide (emacs-auctex-11.86-3)
[jgu] shorewall: shorewall6-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch
shorewall-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch
Both
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[cdamian] sphinx: libsphinxclient-0.9.9-1.fc13.x86_64
this should be fixed in rawhide now
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[mnowak] khmeros-fonts: khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-7.fc12.noarch
newman devel $ rpmquery -lv khmeros-fonts-common
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jul 26 2009
/usr/share/fonts/khmeros
False positive.
--
devel mailing list
[sergiopr] blitz: blitz-doc-0.9-13.fc13.noarch
Fails to build from source at the moment, trying to fix it
[sergiopr] CCfits: CCfits-doc-2.2-3.fc14.noarch
[sergiopr] cloudy: cloudy-doc-08.00-1.fc14.noarch
cloudy-libs-08.00-1.fc14.x86_64 cloudy-devel-doc-08.00-1.fc14.noarch
[sergiopr]
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom \spot\ Callaway wrote:
[salimma] gambit-c: emacs-gambit-4.3.2-4.fc12.x86_64
[salimma] pure: emacs-pure-0.43-2.fc14.noarch
[salimma] vala: emacs-vala-0.9.2-1.fc14.noarch
All updated in Rawhide
Regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[sdz] sugar-tamtam: sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.4.20100201git.fc14.x86_64
This seems to be a false-positive. The activity subpackages all depend
on the common package, which itself contains the license file.
--Sebastian
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[jpopelka] dhcp: 12:dhclient-4.1.1-25.P1.fc14.x86_64
- LICENSE file added to dhclient
[twaugh] cups: 1:cups-libs-1.4.4-5.fc14.x86_64
- LICENSE.txt file moved to libs subpackage
[twaugh] foomatic-db:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 21:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[john5342] ebook-tools: ebook-tools-libs-0.1.1-5.fc12.x86_64
False positive: libs subpackage contains license file and all other
ebook-tools.srpm derived packages depend on it.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the
[pknirsch] tuned: tuned-utils-0.2.14-1.fc14.noarch
Added COPYING into the package. Fixed in git. Soon will be fixed in Fedora
(with new tuned release).
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wednesday 07 July 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[scop] javasqlite: javasqlite-javadoc-20100131-1.fc13.noarch
Fixed in CVS but fails to build at the moment in devel i386 (I suspect
something broken with the i386 sqlite there: #613414)
[scop] vdr: vdr-devel-1.6.0-32.fc14.x86_64
False
On 07/07/2010 03:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hello Fedora!
Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
...
[sandeen] e2fsprogs: e2fsprogs-static-1.41.12-3.fc14.x86_64
libcom_err-1.41.12-3.fc14.x86_64
Added COPYING %doc to the former subpackage
Already exists
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Fedora!
snip
==
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[gemi] GtkAda: GtkAda-gl-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64
GtkAda-glade-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64 GtkAda-gnome-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64
Those sub-libraries do actually depend on the main library, but they weren't
linked to it, which can't be right. I added the missing link options, so now
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
There is actually a benefit to having the subpackage name be part of the
license location, in situations where the independent subpackage name
significantly differs from the basename of the source package, it is
easier for someone not versed in RPM to locate the
2010/7/7 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
[makowski] firebird: firebird-filesystem-2.1.3.18185.0-8.fc14.x86_64
this one only hold some directories
it make no since to put licences in
firebird-doc-2.1.3.18185.0-8.fc14.x86_64
this one have all the doc and of course the licence
--
devel
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[harald] dracut: dracut-tools-006-2.fc14.noarch
[harald] udev: libudev-158-2.fc14.x86_64
What's the problem with these?
$ rpm -ql dracut-tools |grep COPYING
/usr/share/doc/dracut-tools-006/COPYING
$ rpm -q --requires dracut-tools |grep dracut
$
On Wednesday 07 of July 2010 22:29:01 Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
~spot
ons 2010-07-07 klockan 16:29 -0400 skrev Tom spot Callaway:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
~spot
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
openoffice.org:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
Could it be that there is a problem with the build sys on x86_64
On 07/09/2010 10:25 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[twoerner] system-config-firewall:
system-config-firewall-base-1.2.25-1.fc14.noarch
system-config-firewall and system-config-firewall-tui both require
system-config-firewall-base.
system-config-firewall-base provides the COPYING file. Therefore
On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:47 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 04:29:01PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
copies of any license texts (as present in the source) which are
applicable to the
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[sailer] ghdl: ghdl-grt-0.29-1.138svn.0.fc13.x86_64
[sailer] libsqlite3x: libsq3-20071018-8.fc12.x86_64
[sailer] mingw32-libsqlite3x: mingw32-libsq3-20071018-9.fc12.noarch
[sailer] mingw32-wpcap:
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hello Fedora!
Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
Upon the advice of Red Hat Legal, we have slightly amended the Fedora
Licensing Guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines). The
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[mmaslano] perl-Frontier-RPC: perl-Frontier-RPC-doc-0.07b4p1-10.fc14.noarch
The main package and sub-package already requires sub-package doc that
includes copying. Doc sub-package was created to solve conflicts between
those two.
Marcela
--
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom wrote:
However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
copies of any license texts (as present in the source) which are
applicable to the files contained
On 07/07/10 21:29, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
...
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
~spot
...
[pghmcfc]
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[ankursinha] beteckna-fonts: beteckna-fonts-common-0.3-5.fc12.noarch
hi,
Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this because the main package
doesn't Requires:
On 07/08/2010 02:09 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[ankursinha] beteckna-fonts: beteckna-fonts-common-0.3-5.fc12.noarch
hi,
Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom wrote:
[mschwendt] audacious: audacious-libs-2.4-0.3.alpha2.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in Rawhide.
[mschwendt] mcs: mcs-libs-0.7.1-9.fc13.x86_64
False positive. mcs-libs contains all the %doc files, and mcs automatically
depends on mcs-libs.
--
devel
Hi,
--- On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
| [shakthimaan] poky-scripts: poky-depends-6-6.fc13.noarch
\--
poky-depends is just a meta-package that pulls licensed software
already included in Fedora repository required for poky software
builds.
SK
--
[sharkcz] ann: ann-libs-1.1.1-4.fc12.x86_64
= already in -libs
[sharkcz] codeblocks: codeblocks-libs-10.05-1.fc14.x86_64
= fixed in CVS
[sharkcz] openhpi: openhpi-libs-2.14.1-3.fc14.x86_64
= fixed in CVS
[sharkcz] podofo: podofo-libs-0.8.1-2.fc14.x86_64
= correct in actual pkgs
[sharkcz]
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400 Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[michich] opencryptoki: opencryptoki-libs-2.3.1-6.fc14.x86_64
[michich] tpm-tools: tpm-tools-pkcs11-1.3.5-2.fc13.x86_64
Fixed and built for Rawhide.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[jskarvad] sendmail: sendmail-milter-8.14.4-8.fc14.x86_64
license added to sendmail-milter-8.14.4-9.fc14
regards
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[jsafrane] net-snmp: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.5-16.fc14.x86_64
False positive, net-snmp-libs already contains COPYING in %doc
[jsafrane] OpenIPMI: OpenIPMI-libs-2.0.18-2.fc14.x86_64
Fixed, OpenIPMI-2.0.18-3.fc14
Jan
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 04:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[sgallagh] sssd: libcollection-0.4.0-15.fc14.x86_64
libpath_utils-0.2.0-15.fc14.x86_64 libref_array-0.1.0-15.fc14.x86_64
libdhash-0.4.0-15.fc14.x86_64 sssd-client-1.2.1-15.fc14.x86_64
All of these
[psabata] iproute: iproute-doc-2.6.34-3.fc14.x86_64
Should be fixed. Both iproute and iproute-doc now install the COPYING file.
iproute-2.6.34-5.fc14
iproute-doc-2.6.34-5.fc14
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[plautrba] finger: finger-server-0.17-39.fc12.x86_64
Fixed and built for Rawhide.
Petr
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 10:29:01 pm Tom spot Callaway wrote:
file-libs-5.04-10.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
Jan Kaluza
--
devel mailing list
On 07/07/2010 06:08 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
cim-schema-docs has no license file packaged with it. /me blames the
DMTF. The content is a separate tarball. I suppose we could suck the
license file out of the other content zip (the MOF files) and include
here. Thoughts?
If the appropriate
On 07/07/2010 10:49 PM, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[nushio] rabbitvcs: rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3-1.fc14.noarch
I'm not very well versed in legalese, but rabbitvcs-core does include
the
On 07/08/2010 03:07 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 04:29:01PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
copies of any license texts (as present in
On 07/08/2010 03:44 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Basically, what this means is this: If you maintain a package, and that
package generates subpackages, then each subpackage must either include
a copy of the appropriate licensing texts
On 07/08/2010 03:52 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Can you elaborate the cases below?
I can't spot anything wrong with them:
[corsepiu] gtkglext: gtkglext-libs-1.2.0-10.fc12.x86_64
# repoquery -ql 'gtkglext-libs'
...
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/AUTHORS
On 07/08/2010 04:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom wrote:
However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
copies of any license texts (as present in the source)
On 07/08/2010 04:39 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this because the main package
doesn't Requires: -common?
Caveat: I have not looked at your specific spec, so I am hypothesizing here.
Lets
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 10:29:01 pm Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hello Fedora!
Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
[jreznik] leonidas-kde-theme:
leonidas-kde-theme-lion-11.0.3-1.fc12.noarch
leonidas-kde-theme-landscape-11.0.3-1.fc12.noarch
rpmls
2010/7/8 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/08/2010 04:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom wrote:
However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
copies
On 07/07/2010 04:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[omajid] dbus-java: dbus-java-javadoc-2.7-3.fc13.noarch
[omajid] libmatthew-java: libmatthew-java-javadoc-0.7.2-2.fc13.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide.
Cheers,
Omair
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:00 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 04:39 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this because the main package
doesn't Requires: -common?
Caveat: I have not
On 07/08/2010 10:37 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
Dose this mean we only need to add license text to -libs subpackage
instead of base package if we assume the base package depends on -libs
subpackage?
If the base package depends on -libs subpackage, then you can only put
the license text in -libs.
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[kklic] emacs: 1:emacs-common-23.2-5.fc14.x86_64
1:emacs-el-23.2-5.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[ankursinha] beteckna-fonts: beteckna-fonts-common-0.3-5.fc12.noarch
built in rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2305148
regards,
Ankur
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Q. I thought duplicating files in a spec was forbidden?
A. This is a permitted exception to that.
Can we get this new exception reflected in the packaging and review
guidelines, please ?
--
devel mailing list
Le 07/07/2010 22:29, Tom spot Callaway a écrit :
[remi] mysql++: mysql++-manuals-3.1.0-1.fc14.x86_64
done
[remi] ocsinventory: ocsinventory-reports-1.3.2-3.fc14.noarch
false positive
Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/08/2010 12:09 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Q. I thought duplicating files in a spec was forbidden?
A. This is a permitted exception to that.
Can we get this new exception reflected in the packaging and review
guidelines,
On 07/07/2010 11:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[rrelyea] pcsc-lite: pcsc-lite-doc-1.6.1-4.fc14.noarch
pcsc-lite-libs-1.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
Could it be that there is a problem with the build sys on x86_64 which
is causing it to miss?
TTFN
Paul
--
Am Mittwoch, den 07.07.2010, 16:29 -0400 schrieb Tom spot Callaway:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this.
...
[cwickert] nimbus: nimbus-metacity-theme-0.1.4-2.fc13.noarch
gtk-nimbus-engine-0.1.4-2.fc13.x86_64 nimbus-icon-theme-0.1.4-2.fc13.noarch
$ rpm
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
schrieb Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
[tomspur] mpi4py:
mpi4py-docs-1.2.1-3.fc14.noarch mpi4py-common-1.2.1-3.fc14.noarch
mpi4py-docs now requires mpi4py-common. The common subpackage provides
the license files and all other subpackages require now
Hi,
My package malaga was on your list. Here are the %files entries:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_infodir}/%{name}*
%{_bindir}/mal*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_mandir}/man1/mal*
%files -n lib%{name}
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc CHANGES.txt GPL.txt README.txt
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.*
So
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
schrieb Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
cim-schema-docs has no license file packaged with it. /me blames the
DMTF. The content is a separate tarball. I suppose we could suck the
license file out of the other content zip (the MOF files) and include
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Maintainers should look at the bottom of this email for the list.
[jfearn] publican: publican-doc-2.1-0.fc14.noarch
publican-doc includes fdl.txt in it's %files, which is the GFDL 1.2 text
previously sourced from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt
Cheers, Jeff.
--
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Fedora!
Both fixed in rawhide:
[kevin] munin: munin-common-1.4.4-2.fc14.noarch
[kevin] xfce-utils: xfce4-doc-4.6.2-1.fc14.noarch
Thanks.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel
[toshio] python-decorator: python3-decorator-3.2.0-1.fc14.noarch
Fixed
[toshio] python-setuptools: python3-setuptools-0.6.13-5.fc14.noarch
[toshio] python-sqlalchemy: python3-sqlalchemy-0.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64
False positives.
-Toshio
pgpcoKf44yJLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[skvidal] yum-utils: yum-plugin-protectbase-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
yum-plugin-list-data-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
yum-plugin-versionlock-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
yum-updateonboot-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
If a subpackage is dependent (either implicitly or explicitly) upon a
base package (where a base package is defined as a resulting binary
package from the same source RPM which contains the appropriate
license texts as %doc), it is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.comwrote:
[nushio] rabbitvcs: rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3-1.fc14.noarch
I'm not very well versed in legalese, but rabbitvcs-core does include the
following files:
/usr/share/doc/rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3/AUTHORS
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[jwilson] ctrlproxy: ctrlproxy-devel-3.0.8-6.fc14.x86_64
[jwilson] lirc: lirc-doc-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64
lirc-libs-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64 lirc-remotes-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64
All better now. At least, mostly. Sent off a
85 matches
Mail list logo
