On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should.
Example:
RPM 4.9.alpha
rpm -qp --provides
Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
moment but some background and examples can be found here:
http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
moment but some background and examples can be
Panu Matilainen schreef op di 30-11-2010 om 22:10 [+0200]:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
are recommended to use something like this:
%__mingw32_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides}
%__mingw32_requires
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Panu Matilainen schreef op di 30-11-2010 om 22:10 [+0200]:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
are recommended to use something like this:
%__mingw32_provides
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should.
Example:
RPM 4.9.alpha
rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc14
RPM from koji:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages
On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
Anyway, before
PM == Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
PM In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
PM enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
PM moment but some background and examples can be found here:
PM http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:15:47 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
PM == Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
PM In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable
PM and enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce
PM at the moment
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
PM == Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
PM In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
PM enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
PM moment but some background and examples
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
| packages generated.
is going to make it a PITA to conditionalize the
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I haven't
On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
check that all the expected automatic dependencies are there and that
it doesn't fall over in other
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
check that all the expected automatic dependencies are
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files
Le dimanche 28 novembre 2010 à 12:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
| packages generated.
is going to make it a PITA to conditionalize the building of subpackages,
and it's going to
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
Anyway, before going to beta and starting the inevitable Fedora
2010/11/26 Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org:
the new, pluggable and enhanced dependency extration system.
That's really awesome!
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I haven't noticed any
obvious breakages. Beyond that,
22 matches
Mail list logo
