Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-07 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 21:08 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote: * Fedora 18 * mediawiki-validator - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055 * mediawiki-semantic -

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-07 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 21:08 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote: * Fedora 18 * mediawiki-validator - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055 * mediawiki-semantic -

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-06 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 15:23 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: I was not able to use your updated package as the latest version of semantics now requires the Validator[1] extension. [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Validator More specifically: Validator

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote: * Fedora 18 * mediawiki-validator - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055 * mediawiki-semantic - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086060

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-05 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hi, The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3 for F17/F18. The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just mediawiki (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on the old

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
James Laska wrote: I've not had time to spin up a mediawiki instance to test yet. However, if anyone is so inclined, I have updated mediawiki-semantic packages available for test. rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5082817 f18 -

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Michael Cronenworth wrote: I was not able to use your updated package as the latest version of semantics now requires the Validator[1] extension. [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Validator More specifically: Validator = 0.5. Fedora has 0.4.13.

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hi, The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3 for F17/F18. The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just mediawiki (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on the old

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-03-01 Thread James Laska
Greetings gang, I'm happy to rebuild as needed, just ran out of time this week. I'll give it a shot and report back. Thanks, James On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hi, The mediawiki

Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Hi, The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3 for F17/F18. The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just mediawiki (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on the old packages. mediawiki-semantic owner: jlaska If you have your own wiki

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-02-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
You've used unversioned obsoletes, which are bad. That means at no point in time ever again can there be any package named mediawiki-math or mediawiki-nomath. Would you please change them to be versioned as it states in the Packaging Guidelines?

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chuck Anderson wrote: Would you please change them to be versioned as it states in the Packaging Guidelines? Thanks. It'll be fixed before packages make it out to the repos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

2013-02-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.comwrote: Chuck Anderson wrote: Would you please change them to be versioned as it states in the Packaging Guidelines? Thanks. It'll be fixed before packages make it out to the repos. FYI, rpmlint does warn about this