14.05.2013 03:38, Todd Zullinger пишет:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
libgnome-keyring is minimal problem (ok - is _not_ problem at all;
although I'm surprised that _console_ git depends on DE-specific
library).
I just recently made use of libgnome-keyring via python-keyring for a
console applicatio
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
libgnome-keyring is minimal problem (ok - is _not_ problem at all;
although I'm surprised that _console_ git depends on DE-specific
library).
I just recently made use of libgnome-keyring via python-keyring for a
console application I wrote. I thought it was quite handy
13.05.2013 19:30, Adam Williamson:
The problem is that Fedora is too Gnome distro.
That is a rant, not a description of a problem. The simple fact that the
package "libgnome-keyring" has the word "gnome" in it is not sufficient
to qualify as a problem. As Todd wrote, libgnome-keyring itself has
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:23 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
> > Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> >> 11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
> qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
> >>> ...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
> >>> pretty modest:
> >> A
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
[...]
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional. Is
it possible to move them into separate package (for gnome users)?
This doesn't sound too unreasonable at first (and wasn't hard to
do; I tested
On 05/13/2013 02:07 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Todd Zullinger wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is opt
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Eugene Pivnev wrote:
>> 11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
>>> ...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
>>> pretty modest:
>> As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional.
>> Is it possible to
13.05.2013 02:31, Todd Zullinger:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional. Is it
possible to move th
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional.
Is it possible to move them into separate package (for gnome
12.05.2013 17:23, Mamoru TASAKA:
Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00:
12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA:
It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon,
so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base
does not help here.
You mean - xscreensaver daemo
Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00:
12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA:
It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so
splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base
does not help here.
You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2 too
No top-post please.
Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:06 PM +9:00:
Sorry, but as I found in xsceensaver-base (not xscreensaver itself!) - it
contains as xsceensaver as xscreensaver demo (/usr/bin/xscreensaver-demo, glade
based).
And no one xscreensaver config tool.
xscreensaver-demo is t
12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA:
It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so
splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base
does not help here.
You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2 too?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Sorry, but as I found in xsceensaver-base (not xscreensaver itself!) -
it contains as xsceensaver as xscreensaver demo
(/usr/bin/xscreensaver-demo, glade based).
And no one xscreensaver config tool.
12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA:
Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00:
On 05/11/
Hi
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
>>>
> In this discussion xscreensaver dependency is not for xscreensaver modules
> in KDE, but for razorqt{-panel}. It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to
> launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from
> xscreens
Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00:
On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon),
requires gtk2.
IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver modules and if so, the user has no real need
of the demo command. It may be better
11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson:
qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
pretty modest:
As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional.
Is it possible to move them into separate package (for gnome users)?
--
devel mai
11.05.2013 23:59, Kalev Lember:
On 11/05/13 20:01, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
librsvg2 -> gtk3;
I have done a librsvg2 build which should fix this -- can you confirm if
it fixes it for you, and leave karma at Bodhi, please?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.37.0-3.fc19
Can't - I u
11.05.2013 22:01, Eugene Pivnev:
Sorry for big picture - it is because of loopbacks.
Smaller version.
stage2.svg.gz
Description: application/gzip
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon),
requires gtk2.
IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver modules and if so, the user has no real
need of the demo command. It may be better to move xscreensaver-demo
into its own package
Ra
Adam Williamson wrote, at 05/12/2013 04:22 AM +9:00:
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 22:01 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Problematic dependencies that I found:
xscreensaver_base -> libglade2 -> gtk2;
These ones look a bit more significant. xscreensaver-base's dep on gtk2
in particular looks odd.
The
On 11/05/13 20:01, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> librsvg2 -> gtk3;
I have done a librsvg2 build which should fix this -- can you confirm if
it fixes it for you, and leave karma at Bodhi, please?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.37.0-3.fc19
--
Hope this helps,
Kalev
--
devel mailing
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 22:01 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 01.05.2013 23:07, Matthias Clasen:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:46 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> >> Whether I have to create bugreports?
> > Creating patches would be more interesting.
> Creating patches is greate idea - but is too hard for
01.05.2013 23:07, Matthias Clasen:
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:46 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Whether I have to create bugreports?
Creating patches would be more interesting.
Creating patches is greate idea - but is too hard for one man.
I created dependency graph for some qt-based applications (
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:46 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> Whether I have to create bugreports?
Creating patches would be more interesting.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Whether I have to create bugreports?
BTW - gvfs requires as libsecret as libgnome-keyring.
30.04.2013 21:50, Matthias Clasen:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 19:38 +0400, Eugene A. Pivnev wrote:
30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
* gi
On 30.04.2013 17:49, Eugene A. Pivnev wrote:
> 30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells:
>> Eugene Pivnev wrote:
>>
>>> 3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
>>> * git (???)
>> gitk, I imagine.
>>
>> David
> BTW - try to remove libgnome-keyring.
> I'm surprised:
> * PyQt4
> * git
> * gvfs
> * kde
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 19:38 +0400, Eugene A. Pivnev wrote:
> 30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells:
> > Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> >
> >> 3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
> >> * git (???)
> > gitk, I imagine.
> >
> > David
> No. Exactly gnome:
> bash-4.2$ rpm -q --requires git | grep gnome
>
30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
* git (???)
gitk, I imagine.
David
BTW - try to remove libgnome-keyring.
I'm surprised:
* PyQt4
* git
* gvfs
* kdelibs :-)))
* phonon
* qt-config
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
* git (???)
gitk, I imagine.
David
No. Exactly gnome:
bash-4.2$ rpm -q --requires git | grep gnome
libgnome-keyring.so.0
Same thing - in gvfs.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove
> * git (???)
gitk, I imagine.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 20:59 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk?
> And gvfs - removing *gnome*.
It appears that out of the entire gvfsd package, only:
/usr/libexec/gvfsd-recent
requires GTK libraries. Everything else is strictly non-GUI.
Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk?
And gvfs - removing *gnome*.
29.04.2013 01:07, Farkas Levente:
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
I tested - what about Fedora wit
2013/4/29 Eugene Pivnev
> As pcmafm developer said - gvfm use gobject - but not gtk or gnome libs.
> I showed only packages that I was surprised.
> E.g. "ffmpeg requires gtk".
> Very nice.
It's probably because of opencv,
It can probably be spitted carefully at runtime, but opencv-devel cannot b
As pcmafm developer said - gvfm use gobject - but not gtk or gnome libs.
I showed only packages that I was surprised.
E.g. "ffmpeg requires gtk".
Very nice.
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
I
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eugene Pivnev wrote:
>
>> As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
>> I tested - what about Fedora without them?
>> So:
>> 1. yum remove gtk3:
>> ...
>> * gvfs
>> * qt-mobility
>> * qtwebkit
>> * ffmpeg
>> * ffmpeg-libs
>>
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
> I tested - what about Fedora without them?
> So:
> 1. yum remove gtk3:
> ...
> * gvfs
> * qt-mobility
> * qtwebkit
> * ffmpeg
> * ffmpeg-libs
> * mplayer
> * phonon
> * smplayer
> 2. yum remove gtk2:
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
I tested - what about Fedora without them?
So:
1. yum remove gtk3:
...
* gvfs
* qt-mobility
* qtwebkit
* ffmpeg
* ffmpeg-libs
* mplayer
* phonon
* smplayer
2. yum remove gtk2:
+
* ImageMagic
3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs su
38 matches
Mail list logo