On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:50:58AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> RPMs... Well, if someone has an application on their server that doesn't
> run in a container, there are still RPMs on a traditional system. But would
> you install multiple versions stuff on that single system? Or would other
>
/*Adam Samalik*/ wrote on Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:50:58 +0200:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Randy Barlow
>
wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> You add the package and other people start
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > You add the package and other people start to use it. That's great
> > until you need to change the version, but can't, because other people
> > started
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> You add the package and other people start to use it. That's great
> until you need to change the version, but can't, because other people
> started to use it as a dependency and it would break their stuff.
I recently heard that it will be
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 08/06/17 18:54, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that
>>> did want to get into more detail I guess
On 08/06/17 18:54, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that
did want to get into more detail I guess but I think I wound up
there following through from some of the other stuff about
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that
> did want to get into more detail I guess but I think I wound up
> there following through from some of the other stuff about arbitrary
> branching and I was mostly