Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:19 PM, David wrote: > On 15 February 2010 11:19, Arthur G wrote: >> rolling - as in the song - rolling, rolling, rolling, rawhide! > > +1 > > giving 3 names for trees/branches: > > rawhide ---> rolling ---> release > > Reasons it appeals to me: > 1) humorous reference to

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Arthur G
Thanks Dave, Here's one borrowed from the music industry. mastering (or starting with R - remastering) I've used this concept successfully for commercial orgs during their release finalizing stages. Arthur. On 18 February 2010 10:19, David wrote: > On 15 February 2010 11:19, Arthur G wrote:

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread David
On 15 February 2010 11:19, Arthur G wrote: > rolling - as in the song - rolling, rolling, rolling, rawhide! +1 giving 3 names for trees/branches: rawhide ---> rolling ---> release Reasons it appeals to me: 1) humorous reference to the song 2) alliteration, it reads nice, everything begins with

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Frank Murphy
On 17/02/10 08:49, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:34:01 +, >Frank Murphy wrote: >> >> I presume "branched" will then be repointed to an alpha F14. >> rawhide F15 > > That doesn't happen at the release of F13, but rather at F14 alpha freeze. Sorry bad wording. -- Reg

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:34:01 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > > I presume "branched" will then be repointed to an alpha F14. > rawhide F15 That doesn't happen at the release of F13, but rather at F14 alpha freeze. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Frank Murphy
On 17/02/10 08:31, Björn Persson wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: --snipped-- > So when Fedora 13 has been released, is it then no longer branched? It's still > branched from Rawhide but it's not in the Branched state anymore. Doesn't that > sound a bit awkward? > > Björn Persson > I presume "branch

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-17 Thread Björn Persson
Jesse Keating wrote: > Looking at a set of wiki pages to work on today, I had another thought. > We could just call it 'Branched', as in, "Fedora 13 has Branched", > "Branched Freeze Policy", "Once a Fedora release has branched from > rawhide, ", "Mark this test-update as stable to go into the

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:35 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting > > things that are tagged for the release a

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, >> pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things >> that are tagged for the release after the

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-15 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/15/2010 09:12 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:25:03 +0100, > Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> >> The obvious way to call something which is not 13, but is something >> a little less than 13 is 12.9, but I agree with you that it would be better >> to have 13 in the name inst

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:25:03 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > The obvious way to call something which is not 13, but is something > a little less than 13 is 12.9, but I agree with you that it would be better > to have 13 in the name instead of 12, so, logically: > > 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 1

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-15 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57:51 -0500, > Mail Lists wrote: >> Maybe follow the kernel naming scheme .. >> >> 12 is the released version >> 12.x is what will become 13 .. >> 13.rc is now a release candidate (no longer development) >> 13 is released > > Anythin

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57:51 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: > > Maybe follow the kernel naming scheme .. > > 12 is the released version > 12.x is what will become 13 .. > 13.rc is now a release candidate (no longer development) > 13 is released Anything related to the next release sho

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Arthur G
rolling - as in the song - rolling, rolling, rolling, rawhide! On 15 February 2010 11:06, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 09:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Of course, if wanna keep the "gold" name for the official release path, > could rename other and use below.. > > bronze -

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mike Chambers
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 09:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: Of course, if wanna keep the "gold" name for the official release path, could rename other and use below.. bronze - current rawhide silver - current devel branch for next release gold - current officially released branch -- Mike Chambers

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:45:32PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a cleve

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 18:38, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 17:29 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 16:52, Mike Chambers wrote: >> > Rawhide - Rawhide dir as we know it >> > Tanning - Devel branch for next release, in this case 13 >> > Leather - Official rele

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread John Poelstra
Jesse Keating said the following on 02/14/2010 08:24 AM Pacific Time: > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 07:54 -0800, John Poelstra wrote: >> I don't see the awkwardness either. >> >> I see it adding simplicity which is what we need vs. another name we >> have to explain to people less involved in the develop

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 17:29 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 16:52, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Rawhide - Rawhide dir as we know it > > Tanning - Devel branch for next release, in this case 13 > > Leather - Official release path, in this case, 12. > > Haikel had already suggest

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/14/2010 10:52 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > Rawhide - Rawhide dir as we know it > Tanning - Devel branch for next release, in this case 13 > Leather - Official release path, in this case, 12. > > That's the basic process of creating leather, so why not go with it > (minus leather if want to)?

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/14/2010 11:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > How do you easily answer the question "What state is Fedora 13 in right > now?" > > We can say "It's in rawhide still", we can say "It's released", what we > don't have is what it is between those two. We could potentially use > "It's in Alpha, it's

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 16:52, Mike Chambers wrote: > Rawhide - Rawhide dir as we know it > Tanning - Devel branch for next release, in this case 13 > Leather - Official release path, in this case, 12. Haikel had already suggested « tanning », and I must say I really like the analogy. Except that

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 07:54 -0800, John Poelstra wrote: > I don't see the awkwardness either. > > I see it adding simplicity which is what we need vs. another name we > have to explain to people less involved in the development/release > process: what it is, if they should use it, etc. > > Here

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread John Poelstra
Adam Williamson said the following on 02/14/2010 12:00 AM Pacific Time: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't >>> really need to have its own nam

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 15:35 +0100, Robin Sonefors wrote: > Now, from my experience in the Ubuntu community, nobody actually > understands this, while a significantly higher percentage of Ubuntu > users knows what Debian's stable/testing/unstable means. I think this > suggests that the Debian model

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Robin Sonefors
On sön, 2010-02-14 at 00:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Why can't you just say 'The Fedora 13 repo' and 'things go into Fedora > 13'? As others have said, this is how Ubuntu does it and it seems to > work fine there. Technically, it's not. Ubuntu uses their animal names for in-development cod

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Mail Lists wrote: > On 02/13/2010 01:34 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: > >> "Pre" or "Prerelease" was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's >> not saving any confusion there :/ >> > > > Ok - how about 13-dev ... or 13-frontier .. or 13-al

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 22:36 +0100, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > > > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir > > > testing - packages for current development release going to testing >

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't > > really need to have its own name that's always the same... > > Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > >

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:36:00 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 16:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > > CuredHide > > Actually, I kind of like where this is going. Rawhide -> Curing -> > Stable > braising ... what a meal will it be ... Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir > > testing - packages for current development release going to testing > > stable - packages for current development release going to main

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing.  We > don't yet have a clever name f

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/13/2010 01:34 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: > "Pre" or "Prerelease" was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's > not saving any confusion there :/ > Ok - how about 13-dev ... or 13-frontier .. or 13-alpha .. or even 13-not-yet-

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 16:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > CuredHide Actually, I kind of like where this is going. Rawhide -> Curing -> Stable -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message par

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: > How about call it 13pre ... keep it simple and what it is - no need > for > contortions. "Pre" or "Prerelease" was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's not saving any confusion there :/ -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a featu

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 16:52:55 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > >> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't > >> really need to have its own name that's always the same... > > > Mostly because it beco

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/13/2010 10:48 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't >> really need to have its own name that's always the same... > How about call it 13pre ... keep it simple and what it

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Sven Lankes
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't >> really need to have its own name that's always the same... > Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13 > is released, In my w

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Murphy
On 13/02/10 00:45, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this concept

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't > really need to have its own name that's always the same... Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13 is released, and when we're trying

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > staging - devel release for main dir We use the term staging when we have are putting things on the master mirror for our other mirrors to pick up (: -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir > > testing - packages for current development release going to testing > > stable - packages for current development release going to main

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing.  We > don't yet have a clever name fo

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir > testing - packages for current development release going to testing > stable - packages for current development release going to main dir > release - packages for current officially released already g

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this concept yet, and we've jus

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Murphy
On 13/02/10 05:18, Adam Williamson wrote: --snipped-- >> Want to help us come up with a term we could use to reference this tree? >> Email away! > > Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't > really need to have its own name that's always the same... +2 Easier tell the

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 13/02/2010 01:45, Jesse Keating a écrit : > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 13.02.2010 06:18, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, >> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things >> that are tagged for the release after they get thr

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Pierre-Yves
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 +0530, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/13/2010 07:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:39:45 +1000 > > Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > >>> On 02/12/2

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Adam Miller
vanguard Its got a nice "we're leading the way" ring to it :) -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing.  We > don't yet have a clever name f

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread draco
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:45:32PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a cleve

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Hiemanshu Sharma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/13/2010 07:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:39:45 +1000 > Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: >>> On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll h

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Robert Relyea
On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:39:45 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > > On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the > > > mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be > >

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > > that are tagged for the release after they get th

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Josh Stone
On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Jesse Keating
As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We don't yet have a clever name for this concept yet, and we've just been calling it "Pending".