Greetings folks,
Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package used in several
upcoming AutoQA test cases? The package is beakerlib (a shell-level
integration testing library), and the review request can be found at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561470.
I've done my best to
JL == James Laska jla...@redhat.com writes:
JL Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
JL used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the packager in
question done any other review work? Submitted other packages
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:33 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JL == James Laska jla...@redhat.com writes:
JL Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
JL used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the
AW == Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
AW I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
packager group, so he could just do the review. According to the ticket
in question, a sponsor for the packager is required
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
AW == Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
AW I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
packager group, so he could just do the review.
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
AW == Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
AW I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
packager group, so he could just do the review. According
JL == James Laska jla...@redhat.com writes:
JL I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing
JL and sponsoring this package review request?
Again, we don't sponsor packages or package review requests. We sponsor
packagers. Packagers need to demonstrate various things
