Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Lorenzo Dalrio
I have a half-working setup: I use a bridge on my home server to connect via vpn like if i was at home, but i am unable to create a tap device with NetworkManager. I have bridge0 and em1 managed by NetworkManager and an ifcfg-tap0 file to bring up tap0 before openvpn start. 2014/1/16 Steve

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: My old notes at https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor were pretty good. If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or consistent

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 17:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 14:53 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote: On 18.01.2014 03:34, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote: journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service better use # journalctl -b -u

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
My old notes at https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor were pretty good. If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or consistent network connections of any sort for server grade installations, my

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-20 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 01/20/2014 08:18 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Networkmanager is not your friend for stable servers. I'm using it on a server with multiple interfaces, multiple vlans, multiple bridges, a VPN and a VM and it doesn't give me any trouble. I would say 95% of the setup was done through the

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-18 Thread Alek Paunov
On 18.01.2014 03:34, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote: journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service better use # journalctl -b -u NetworkManager -u has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-18 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for NetworkManager, that might help us figure out

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-17 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 01/16/2014 08:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? I know I have not... I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates two file in

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-17 Thread Steve Dickson
On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote: journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service better use # journalctl -b -u NetworkManager -u has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple times with different units and get a combined output. Good go know... thanks! steved. -- devel

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote: journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service better use # journalctl -b -u NetworkManager -u has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple times with different units and

NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? I know I have not... I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts ifcfg-Bridge_connection_1 ifcfg-bridge0_slave_1 The contents seem

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? I know I have not... I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Dickson
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? I know I have not... I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates two file in

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Dickson
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on: journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service The log is at:

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on: journalctl -b

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Dickson
On 16/01/14 15:38, Dan Williams wrote: I bet ya the hang has something to do with these messages: info (bridge0): IPv4 config waiting until carrier is on info (bridge0): IPv6 config waiting until carrier is on info Activation (bridge0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete.