On 22/08/2021 13:52, Ankur Sinha wrote:
An example of what, though?
All Flatpaks with --filesystem={home,system}.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Thank you Ankur
Happy to move forward with your help.
On 2021-08-22 12:52, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 11:31:32 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On
21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote: So, if we can do anything to make
it easier for developers to just
maintain their one or
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 11:31:32 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > So, if we can do anything to make it easier for developers to just
> > maintain their one or two tools for the Fedora community, that'll be
> > good.
>
> And we will get a lot of
On 21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
So, if we can do anything to make it easier for developers to just
maintain their one or two tools for the Fedora community, that'll be
good.
And we will get a lot of low-quality packages with bundled a lot of
libraries, ignoring Fedora build flags,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 17:22:59 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] :
> >
> > I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do
> > see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or
> > individuals who'd just like to maintain their
* Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] :
>
> I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do
> see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or
> individuals who'd just like to maintain their few packages.
To be fair, the system does address the case of the
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 11:34:51 +0100, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
> Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained : https://
> github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
>
>
> but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
>
> Any help very welcome
Well, "pushing
On 20/08/2021 12:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
You need to find a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained :
https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
Any help very welcome
On 2021-08-18 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
Relevant history:
Relevant history:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82
In short, a package was submitted and approved, but the submitter (who
is also the upstream author) is discouraged by the need to seek
sponsorship into the packager group.
Hi
How to find someone able to push the code in a RPM package ?
Reminder
- Source code : https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/
- Reference : https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/
- Existing ArchLinux package (not AUR)
:https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=dovecot-fts-xapian
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
