Re: No arch broken dependency issue

On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:10:33 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote: > So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26? I probably don't understand the question. This IMO shouldn't be blocker for Fedora 26 release, just there's the issue that packages which: BuildArch:

Re: No arch broken dependency issue

So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26? The emails are annoying but I'm more concerned that things will be broken when branch from rawhide happens. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM

Re: No arch broken dependency issue

On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote: > Hi, > I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having. > > I keep getting this email: > >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > >On ppc64le: > >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch

No arch broken dependency issue

Hi, I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having. I keep getting this email: >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >On ppc64le: >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love >Please resolve this as soon as possible. This is because it's