On 23. 04. 20 16:28, Kamil Dudka wrote:
It really looks like my requests
were ignored until maintainer status was called into question.
Because you did not use an appropriate channel to discuss your concerns.
Bugzilla is a tool to report bugs, most frequently when something does
not work as
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> That's not how this works.
>
> Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
>
>> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
>> status for that. Michal (the maintainer,
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> That's not how this works.
Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
> status for that. Michal (the maintainer, who isn't you) even used it -
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
>
> The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place.
That's not how this works.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place. You just
expressed your personal opinion about a package
Martin Sehnoutka writes:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> I'm pretty sure Michal would respond if you contacted him via email.
Hi Martin, you've dropped Michal from CC in your reply, but I did
include Michal on my original email. In other words: this *is*
contacting by email :)
> Also Michal is far from
Good point, thanks!
On 22/04/2020 10:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 04. 20 10:21, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
Regarding the abrt reports: I can see a lot of them are for Wireshark,
but given the size of Wireshark codebase and speed of its development
it would require a huge effort to fix all of
On 22. 04. 20 10:21, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
Regarding the abrt reports: I can see a lot of them are for Wireshark, but given
the size of Wireshark codebase and speed of its development it
would require a huge effort to fix all of them.
Not related to Michal at all, more general thought:
If
Hi Robbie,
I'm pretty sure Michal would respond if you contacted him via email.
Also Michal is far from being inactive on bugzilla and the fact that he
has few open bugs does not prove otherwise.
Regarding the abrt reports: I can see a lot of them are for Wireshark,
but given the size of
Hi, in accordance with non-responsive maintainer policy [1], does anyone
know how to contact Michal Ruprich (mruprich)?
Michal, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please
respond here and also in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
10 matches
Mail list logo
