Re: Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

2022-02-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:47:11AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so

Re: Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

2022-02-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > Having a

Re: Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

2022-02-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 09:58:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, Hello, > - shaneallcroft contacted since January 28th > > shaneallcroft is main admin of rpms/pyplane > shaneallcroft has a bugzilla override on rpms/pyplane Shane is active. I'll contact him on the

Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

2022-02-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: