On 07/07/15 06:03 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> Dear Luya.
>
> I consider this to be one of the most unfair manner
> I've ever seen in my life.
I apologize you have read that way.
>
> You haven't tried to contact me directly in any way
> even when it is not difficult at all. I'm available
> on the #fe
Dear Luya.
I consider this to be one of the most unfair manner
I've ever seen in my life.
You haven't tried to contact me directly in any way
even when it is not difficult at all. I'm available
on the #fedora-devel IRC channel and you could send
me a direct e-mail message as well. Instead of that
On 04/07/15 03:08 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>> Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is
>> unresponsive.
> The patch has been attached less
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is
> unresponsive.
The patch has been attached less than a week ago ...
--
devel mailing list
de
Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is
unresponsive.
Unfortunately, I am not in proven packager group so it would be nice if
someone can submitted and update that package. I understand the main
ma
