Re: lablgtk 2.18.0 in Rawhide (was: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 08:09:38AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: LablGTK are the OCaml bindings for Gtk. I am just about to push the new version of 'ocaml-lablgtk' to Rawhide, and this will cause dependency breakage

lablgtk 2.18.0 in Rawhide (was: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-10-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
LablGTK are the OCaml bindings for Gtk. I am just about to push the new version of 'ocaml-lablgtk' to Rawhide, and this will cause dependency breakage for any package that depends on that. I will rebuild dependencies as needed. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Re: lablgtk 2.18.0 in Rawhide (was: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-10-01 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: LablGTK are the OCaml bindings for Gtk. I am just about to push the new version of 'ocaml-lablgtk' to Rawhide, and this will cause dependency breakage for any package that depends on that. I will rebuild

Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend

2013-09-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:30:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: OCaml 4.01.0 is a new major release of the language. I'm not expecting any incompatibilities, but it will require a mass rebuild of the 100 or so Fedora OCaml packages in Rawhide, which I will do this weekend. The packaging

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-17 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a summary of what I'm doing: While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have noticed all 3 of the following: - ExclusiveArch:

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a summary of what I'm doing: While looking through the packages still needing a

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-16 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: This is a compiler-internal error with using the -g option. It means that the (file, line) location number has line == 0 and the compiler refuses to emit DWARF info with line == 0 because (according to the comment in

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:05:45AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: This is a compiler-internal error with using the -g option. It means that the (file, line) location number has line == 0 and the compiler refuses to

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 14:04:08 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: If that works, push it and build it. If there are any problems, you can either ask me or just leave that package. Can you check that ocaml-camlimages looks OK now? -- devel mailing list

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 01:25:39PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 14:04:08 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: If that works, push it and build it. If there are any problems, you can either ask me or just leave that package. Can you check that

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:48:37PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: Fatal error: exception Assert_failure(asmcomp/emitaux.ml, 226, 4) make[3]: *** [pa_lisp.cmx] Error 2 Since there is no such source file as emitaux.ml in ocaml-camlp5, I assume that must be an ocaml source file. This is a

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 23:20:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Unfortunately the package uses 'omake' so it's anyone's guess how to make it pass the right flags. I have no experience with omake. I wasn't able to do local builds because of an omake related error. Koji

Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-14 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a summary of what I'm doing: - Check that the master branch hasn't been updated already. - Check if there's a new upstream version, and upgrade to it if so. - REMOVE any of: %global/%define debug_package %{nil}

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-14 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a summary of what I'm doing: - Check that the master branch hasn't been updated already. - Check if there's a new upstream version, and upgrade to

OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend

2013-09-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
OCaml 4.01.0 is a new major release of the language. I'm not expecting any incompatibilities, but it will require a mass rebuild of the 100 or so Fedora OCaml packages in Rawhide, which I will do this weekend. I'm also planning to: - update the ARM code generator - enable debuginfo