On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
I made a Rel-Eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5427
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, IMHO reading the bug it just sounds like to me a mistake was made
> and the obsoletes/conflicts was not removed as intended:
>
> +* Sun Nov 4 2012 Jindrich Novy 2012-5-20121024
> +- don't conflict with latexmk (#868996)
>
> (but that ve
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:13:27 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> >> Sorry, it must be too early in the morning for my brain to work
> >> properly. What would I be asking FESCO to d
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>> Sorry, it must be too early in the morning for my brain to work
>> properly. What would I be asking FESCO to do?
>
> Decide between the two redundant and conflicting packagings
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> >> > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
> >> > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch
> >> This one should not be obsoleted. See
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate
> >> Jindrich doing something about
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>> wrote:
>> > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
>> [snip]
>> > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch
>> This one should not be obsoleted. See
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> wrote:
> > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
> [snip]
> > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch
> This one should not be obsoleted. See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate
> Jindrich doing something a
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
[snip]
> latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch
This one should not be obsoleted. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate
Jindrich doing something about that before release.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:55:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> > Are there other obsoleted packages in the F18 repo?
>
> Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
>
> qxmpp-dev-0.6.3.1-1.fc18.i686
> qxmpp-dev-0.6.3.1-1.fc18.x86_64
> qxmpp-dev-
On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Are there other obsoleted packages in the F18 repo?
Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
4ti2-1.3.2-12.fc18.x86_64
anyremote2html-1.4-4.fc18.noarch
chktex-1.6.4-11.fc18.x86_64
classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.i686
classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.x86_64
classad
10 matches
Mail list logo