Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: I made a Rel-Eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5427 -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:/

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, IMHO reading the bug it just sounds like to me a mistake was made > and the obsoletes/conflicts was not removed as intended: > > +* Sun Nov 4 2012 Jindrich Novy 2012-5-20121024 > +- don't conflict with latexmk (#868996) > > (but that ve

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:13:27 -0700 Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > >> Sorry, it must be too early in the morning for my brain to work > >> properly. What would I be asking FESCO to d

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: >> Sorry, it must be too early in the morning for my brain to work >> properly. What would I be asking FESCO to do? > > Decide between the two redundant and conflicting packagings

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > >> > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: > >> > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch > >> This one should not be obsoleted. See > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate > >> Jindrich doing something about

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: >> wrote: >> > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: >> [snip] >> > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch >> This one should not be obsoleted. See >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > wrote: > > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: > [snip] > > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch > This one should not be obsoleted. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate > Jindrich doing something a

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: [snip] > latexmk-4.35-1.fc18.noarch This one should not be obsoleted. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868996. I'd appreciate Jindrich doing something about that before release.

Re: Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:55:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > Are there other obsoleted packages in the F18 repo? > > Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: > > qxmpp-dev-0.6.3.1-1.fc18.i686 > qxmpp-dev-0.6.3.1-1.fc18.x86_64 > qxmpp-dev-

Obsoleted packages in repositories (was: grub (v1) in f18?)

2012-12-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: Are there other obsoleted packages in the F18 repo? Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile: 4ti2-1.3.2-12.fc18.x86_64 anyremote2html-1.4-4.fc18.noarch chktex-1.6.4-11.fc18.x86_64 classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.i686 classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.x86_64 classad