Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý

FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542

This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With 
more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.

I would like to thanks Lee for his incredible patience.

Now oldest review in queue is only 5 years old.

If you are packager you can help with this state by doing review:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer

--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Systems Management Engineering
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Mario Ceresa
I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
trapped in the Neverending Story :)

Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?

Best,

Mario

On 18 December 2012 10:15, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
 FYI:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542

 This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With more
 then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
 I would like to thanks Lee for his incredible patience.

 Now oldest review in queue is only 5 years old.

 If you are packager you can help with this state by doing review:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer

 --
 Miroslav Suchy
 Red Hat Systems Management Engineering
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com wrote:
 I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
 trapped in the Neverending Story :)

 Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?

It seems this one is even older:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317

Bye,

Andrea.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Brendan Jones

On 12/18/2012 01:21 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote:

I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
trapped in the Neverending Story :)

Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?

Best,

Mario

What is truly amazing is that the submitter was FE-NEEDSPONSOR the whole 
time. Kudos

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:15:39 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

 FYI:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
 
 This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With 
 more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
 I would like to thanks Lee for his incredible patience.

Chapeau!
 
 Now oldest review in queue is only 5 years old.
 
 If you are packager you can help with this state by doing review:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer

If you are a package submitter, you can help with this state, too,
by trying to review your own package with the help of the Review
Guidelines. Complete the most basic reviewing steps, such as running
rpmlint on the src.rpm and the build rpms, and handle the first errors
yourself:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor

It's also highly recommended (and appreciated by the reviewers) that
if you cannot work on your package for some time, please say so with
a brief comment and mark the ticket as NotReady (in the Whiteboard field).

-- 
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.10-5.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.25 0.23 0.23
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:47:09 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:

 What is truly amazing is that the submitter was FE-NEEDSPONSOR the whole 
 time. Kudos

Not really. It has been the submitter's only package review request.
Possibly without a request to become a co-maintainer of other packages
in the Fedora package collection. And the guidelines expect the sponsor
to be the reviewer of the first package to be included.

Sponsorship for the packager group is possible without making it
dependent on pending review requests (which sometimes are not completed
because of severe stability issues, licensing issues, or long-term
unbundling activity without an exception from the FPC, e.g.).

-- 
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.10-5.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.31 0.25 0.23
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Oldest package review resolved

2012-12-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:15 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
 FYI:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
 
 This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With 
 more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
 I would like to thanks Lee for his incredible patience.

I guess it was submitted back in the days when people remembered what
'fax machines' were ;)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel