Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-25 Thread Florian Weimer
On 07/25/2016 09:06 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 19:11 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: urgh, yes, that's practically guaranteed to crash LibreOffice which could pull in openssl via neon, python-stmp, postgresql-libs, openldap, curl, librdf, any gnome-vfs backend, and

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-25 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 19:11 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 22.07.2016 16:53, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2. Add compat 1.0.2 package which would be used by 3rd party > > > applications and also temporarily by applications

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Stahl wrote: > the only safe way to provide a compat openssl package is as a -devel > package that only contains a static library :P Even then, you need to mark all the symbols as hidden if you do not want them to get exported from shared libraries linking to it. (And of course the

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Michael Stahl
On 22.07.2016 16:53, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> >> 2. Add compat 1.0.2 package which would be used by 3rd party >> applications and also temporarily by applications that are not yet >> ported to the new API. However the current plan is to not

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Pá, 2016-07-22 at 10:24 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 10:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 17:17 +0300, Antti Järvinen wrote: > > > > > > > > Tomas Mraz writes: > > > > > for anybody

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Pá, 2016-07-22 at 10:24 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 10:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 17:17 +0300, Antti Järvinen wrote: > > > > > > Tomas Mraz writes: > > >  > for anybody insterested in testing and/or porting applications > > > to the > > >  >

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 10:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 17:17 +0300, Antti Järvinen wrote: > > Tomas Mraz writes: > > > for anybody insterested in testing and/or porting applications to the > > > new OpenSSL 1.1.0 API I've prepared a COPR repository: > > > > Strongly

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 17:17 +0300, Antti Järvinen wrote: > Tomas Mraz writes: > > for anybody insterested in testing and/or porting applications to the > > new OpenSSL 1.1.0 API I've prepared a COPR repository: > > Strongly advised, OpenSSL 1.1 API changes slightly compared to 1.0 and > at

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Antti Järvinen
Tomas Mraz writes: > for anybody insterested in testing and/or porting applications to the > new OpenSSL 1.1.0 API I've prepared a COPR repository: Strongly advised, OpenSSL 1.1 API changes slightly compared to 1.0 and at least in debian the list of packages not compiling any more was rather

OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

2016-07-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
Hi, for anybody insterested in testing and/or porting applications to the new OpenSSL 1.1.0 API I've prepared a COPR repository: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tmraz/OpenSSL-1.1.0/ The FIPS patches and system crypto policy patch is not yet ported. If you find any problems or have any