Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Hi Daniel, On November 23, 2022 5:44:01 PM UTC, "Daniel P. Berrangé" wrote: >On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:20:24PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: >> >> >> Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: >> > Hello. >> > >> > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed >> >

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 12:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 11. 22 3:38, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> go-compilers > >> go-srpm-macros > > > > These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's > > now a

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 11. 22 18:44, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > IMHO we would be better off eliminating the notion of 'main admin' > > entirely and have all co-maintainers be at the equal level, so there > > is no need for a dance to give packages

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 18:44, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: IMHO we would be better off eliminating the notion of 'main admin' entirely and have all co-maintainers be at the equal level, so there is no need for a dance to give packages to comaintainers. There should only be manual action needed if the last

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 24. 11. 22 3:38, Maxwell G via devel wrote: On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: go-compilers go-srpm-macros These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's now a subpackage of go-rpm-macros. But it exists on Fedora 36 and needs a maintainer

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Dne 23. 11. 22 v 21:05 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: The mitigation/successor strategy is to have comaintainers for every package. Unfortunately our tools enforce the notion of a "main admin" and if that person leaves that role has

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23/11/2022 18:44, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: IMHO we would be better off eliminating the notion of 'main admin' entirely and have all co-maintainers be at the equal level, so there is no need for a dance to give packages to comaintainers. There should only be manual action needed if the last

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > go-compilers > go-srpm-macros These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's now a subpackage of go-rpm-macros. go-compilers is Obsoleted by go-rpm-macros itself, but it looks like it has not yet been retired. I've

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 21:17, Jan Chaloupka wrote: I you want all your golang packages reassigned to eclipseo, all you need is to tell me to do it and I'll do it. That would be great. By all means. Thank you. Also, thank you eclipseo for taking care of the packages. In progress. This is what was

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

> I you want all your golang packages reassigned to eclipseo, all you need is > to tell me to do it and I'll do it. That would be great. By all means. Thank you. Also, thank you eclipseo for taking care of the packages. Jan ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 17:35, Jan Chaloupka wrote: Hi Robert-André, Checking the consul it looks like I need to create a ticket for all orphaned package to change their point of contact. Assuming the same holds for all other orphaned packages one ticket with request to change their PoC is more

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > The mitigation/successor strategy is to have comaintainers for every > package. > > Unfortunately our tools enforce the notion of a "main admin" and > if that person leaves that role has to be given to another > comaintainer

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:20:24PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > Hello. > > > > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed > > them from their Fedora packages. > > > > They left Red Hat and are no longer interested

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Hi Robert-André, Checking the consul it looks like I need to create a ticket for all orphaned package to change their point of contact. Assuming the same holds for all other orphaned packages one ticket with request to change their PoC is more practical than creating one for each. Feel free to

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora packages. I am wondering, why Red Hat/FESCO/... still hasn't

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 13:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: Also jchaloup is also out of the picture, could you see with him for orphaning is golang packages too? I can try. I do not think they left Red Hat. If you want, you can follow the nonresponsive packager policy or email them yourself on their email

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 12:45, Bob Mauchin wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, 12:21 Miro Hrončok, > wrote: Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, 12:21 Miro Hrončok, wrote: > Hello. > > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed > them > from their Fedora packages. > > They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora > packages. > > Co-maintainers BCC'ed. > > fpokorny is

Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora packages. Co-maintainers BCC'ed. fpokorny is main admin of rpms/consul rpms/consul co-maintainers: @jchaloup