On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
>> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
>> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Short question:
> > PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
> > According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
> > layer that emulates the Windo
On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
> 1.0 as a post install
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 04:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > if there would be much more care by introducing new features/replacements
> > my understanding for the fear of update thmen after that would be much
> higher
> >
> > as long fedora is shootin
On 10/08/2011 04:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if there would be much more care by introducing new features/replacements
> my understanding for the fear of update thmen after that would be much higher
>
> as long fedora is shooting out new features without any care if they are
> really ready fdora
Am 08.10.2011 22:36, schrieb Peter Robinson:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Short question:
>> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
>> According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
>> layer that emulates the Windows sound system)
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Short question:
> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
> According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
> layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires
> current PA (1.0?) to work relia
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>> >
Am 08.10.2011 21:40, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>>> version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>>>
>>> What
Eerm, I mean recommended as not usable. Using padevchooser breaks most
PulseAudio environments even now, so don't use it.
2011/10/8 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
> There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would
> absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has lo
There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would
absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since
been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite
nicely.
[1]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/1.0
On S
2011/10/8 Rex Dieter
>
>
> > I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
> > information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
> > wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
> > 1.0 as a post installation upgrade or alternatively,
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
> >
> > Our obje
2011/10/8 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> How would someone go about doing that, anyway?
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
How would someone go about doing that, anyway?
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated version of
> > OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happen
On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated version of
> OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>
> What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
>
> Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months after the
> competit
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> I think it's too late for F16 to do such drastic changes. We are way
> after freeze. PA is a core component and should be tested thorugfully
> before including in release.
> Ubuntu shipped 0.99 snapshots for some time and had enough tests
> apparently.
If Ubuntu is doing a
Am 08.10.2011 19:34, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 12:23:04PM -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>> It might be better to make a case to bend the rules for PulseAudio and have
>> it included in Fedora 16. It could be problematic if more programs have
>> issues like wine where th
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
>> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
>> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
>> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
>> 1.0 as a post installation u
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 12:23:04PM -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> It might be better to make a case to bend the rules for PulseAudio and have
> it included in Fedora 16. It could be problematic if more programs have
> issues like wine where they won't work with pre-1.0 PulseAudio properly or
It might be better to make a case to bend the rules for PulseAudio and have
it included in Fedora 16. It could be problematic if more programs have
issues like wine where they won't work with pre-1.0 PulseAudio properly or
reliably.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
> > I mi
> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
> 1.0 as a post installation upgrade or alternatively, using a personal
> repo?
I can
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 15:43, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Short question:
>> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
>
> It was released 12 days ago.
My mistake.
>
>> According to the wine developers, the updated
On Sat, 08.10.11 15:43, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Short question:
> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
It was released 12 days ago.
> According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
> layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-les
Hello all,
Short question:
PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires
current PA (1.0?) to work reliably. [1]
For now, sound is completely broken under wine on any of m
25 matches
Mail list logo
