On 11. 07. 20 1:59, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, July 10, 2020 2:53:30 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
action
on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:35:05PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 4:39:21 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 09. 07. 20 14:24, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> > >
> > >> One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is
On Friday, July 10, 2020 2:53:30 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> >>> DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
> >>> action
> >>> on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on
> >>> the system. However
On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action
on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on
the system. However I worry that DNF does not possess a capability for
doing it. (Except of injecting that
On Friday, July 10, 2020 4:39:21 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 07. 20 14:24, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> >
> >> One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is trying to remove `fedora-
> >> repos-modular` and
On 09. 07. 20 12:55, Igor Raits wrote:
I don't know where / which the fix should be: DNF, comps or both.
Simply putting the fedora-repos-modular in comps won't help since DNF
is only using them when running `group install/update/remove`.
How much crazy would it be to call `dnf group upgrade
On 09. 07. 20 14:24, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is trying to remove `fedora-
repos-modular` and `fedora-repos-rawhide-modular`.
[...]
I don't know where / which the fix should be: DNF, comps or both.
On 09. 07. 20 20:19, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 11:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 16:45 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
DNF should perform
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:15:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:09:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What we're dealing with now is awkward consequences of this change for
> > existing installs, where we'd probably want to *keep* modular repos,
> > especially if
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 11:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 16:45 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > DNF should perform "dnf mark install
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:09:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What we're dealing with now is awkward consequences of this change for
> existing installs, where we'd probably want to *keep* modular repos,
> especially if any modules are actually enabled.
Is it a terrible idea to suggest that
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action on
> > a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on the
> > system. However I
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 16:45 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
> > > action on
> > > a system upgrade, because
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:40:52AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45:07 AM MST Igor Raits wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > > Unless I'm mistaken, it should only be present if the user manually
> > > installed
> > > it, and
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45:07 AM MST Igor Raits wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > Unless I'm mistaken, it should only be present if the user manually
> > installed
> > it, and opted into modularity, right?
>
>
> No, it should be installed by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:35 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 3:55:44 AM MST Igor Raits wrote:
> > I don't know where / which the fix should be: DNF, comps or both.
> > Simply putting the fedora-repos-modular in comps won't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
> > action on
> > a system upgrade, because we want that
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, at 10:36 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action on
> > a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on the
> > system. However I
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action on
> a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on the
> system. However I worry that DNF does not possess a capability for doing
> it.
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 3:55:44 AM MST Igor Raits wrote:
> I don't know where / which the fix should be: DNF, comps or both.
> Simply putting the fedora-repos-modular in comps won't help since DNF
> is only using them when running `group install/update/remove`.
What's to fix? Sounds like a
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is trying to remove `fedora-
> repos-modular` and `fedora-repos-rawhide-modular`.
>
[...]
> I don't know where / which the fix should be: DNF, comps or both.
> Simply putting the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is trying to remove `fedora-
repos-modular` and `fedora-repos-rawhide-modular`.
tl;dr. fedora-repos-modular inherit installation reason from fedora-
repos (DEPENDENCY) and nothing depends on
22 matches
Mail list logo
