Re: Package PAM not updating

[Iker Pedrosa]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 6:55 PM Dan Horák  wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:21:53 +0200
> Iker Pedrosa  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a PAM bugzilla <
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124059>
> > that complains about not being able to update to its latest version.
> There
> > seems to be a mix of architectures (x86_64 and i686) for this package and
> > its subpackages (pam and pam-libs).
> >
> > Can someone help me solve the problem?
>
> I have replied in the bug. Seems F-36 GA was released with pam.i386.rpm
> in the repos, likely due a bug in the multilib handler. But F-36
> updates have correctly only pam-devel and pam-libs available as i386
> rpms, causing update issue, that can be fixed by passing
> "--allowerasing" to "dnf update".
>

Thanks for your help Dan!


>
>
> Dan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 

Iker Pedrosa

Software Engineer, Identity Management team

Red Hat 

Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan

(Red) hat on his head and walk the world

Basque proverb

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Package PAM not updating

[Dan Horák]

On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:21:53 +0200
Iker Pedrosa  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> There's a PAM bugzilla 
> that complains about not being able to update to its latest version. There
> seems to be a mix of architectures (x86_64 and i686) for this package and
> its subpackages (pam and pam-libs).
> 
> Can someone help me solve the problem?

I have replied in the bug. Seems F-36 GA was released with pam.i386.rpm
in the repos, likely due a bug in the multilib handler. But F-36
updates have correctly only pam-devel and pam-libs available as i386
rpms, causing update issue, that can be fixed by passing
"--allowerasing" to "dnf update".


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Package PAM not updating

[Iker Pedrosa]

Hi,

There's a PAM bugzilla 
that complains about not being able to update to its latest version. There
seems to be a mix of architectures (x86_64 and i686) for this package and
its subpackages (pam and pam-libs).

Can someone help me solve the problem?

-- 

Iker Pedrosa

Software Engineer, Identity Management team

Red Hat 

Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan

(Red) hat on his head and walk the world

Basque proverb

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue