Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:11 PM Michael Catanzaro > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini > > > wrote: > > > > As usual, I'm askin

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:45 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 9/20/21 14:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-5.fc34 > > > golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-2.fc35 > > Might be a bug in rpmautospec, it has reset the Release to 1 when it did > a buil

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-22 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On 9/20/21 14:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: - golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-5.fc34 > golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-2.fc35 Might be a bug in rpmautospec, it has reset the Release to 1 when it did a build with the bootstrap flag. __

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:11 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > As usual, I'm asking: Is it OK for me to fix obvious oversights, such > > > as "package

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:11 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > As usual, I'm asking: Is it OK for me to fix obvious oversights, such > > as "package was built successfully, it just needs to be submitted to > > bodhi" or "package

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:43:20PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Yeah, it's *that* time of the year again. I have again compared Fedora > 34 and Fedora 35 repository contents to check for package downgrades. > I have categorized all issues in the complete list below. Common >

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-20 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > ... - ulauncher-0:5.13.0-1.fc34 > ulauncher-0:5.12.1-1.fc35 > ... I just submitted the new ulauncher 5.14 update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-894c62b141 (and similarly for F34) so it should be resolved shortly. ___

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-20 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: As usual, I'm asking: Is it OK for me to fix obvious oversights, such as "package was built successfully, it just needs to be submitted to bodhi" or "packager obviously only forgot to merge a change to f35 and build it there as wel

Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

2021-09-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hey everybody, Yeah, it's *that* time of the year again. I have again compared Fedora 34 and Fedora 35 repository contents to check for package downgrades. I have categorized all issues in the complete list below. Common issues are the same as last few releases: - package was built for f35 but no