Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects easier since right now on the

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-12 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since people live across

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-11 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011, 18:55:11 schrieb tim.laurid...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know a lot of people wanted to

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-08 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first, but since we had the opportunity to

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011: After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity unless I'm missing something. I am still interested. Anyone else? Sorry for taking time to reply, but I had a bit too many things at once sprung up on me

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Thu Oct 06 22:30:06 +0200 2011: RS == Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes: RS After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity RS unless I'm missing something. Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
RS == Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes: RS After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity RS unless I'm missing something. Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually do anything. Basically I stopped after I called for a couple of folks to help me

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011: After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity unless I'm missing something. I am still interested. Anyone else?

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from tim.laurid...@gmail.com's message of Fri Oct 07 16:41:49 +0200 2011: On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011: After some initial interest there doesn't appear to

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Richard Shaw
A side issue... Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects easier since right now on the devel list we have to make it pretty obvious to

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first, but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe there are still many of us still interested,

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first, but since we had the opportunity to hack on this

Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-06 Thread Richard Shaw
After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity unless I'm missing something. I am still interested. Anyone else? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-06 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
RS == Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes: RS After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity RS unless I'm missing something. Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually do anything. Basically I stopped after I called for a couple of folks to help me with

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-06 Thread Mario Blättermann
Am 06.10.2011 22:17, schrieb Richard Shaw: After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity unless I'm missing something. I am still interested. Anyone else? Thanks, Richard Yes, of course. I think we need some infrastructure besides the wiki. And a policy for handling