On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 09:25:32AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Should we make the script more robust and ignore invalid watcher
> > emails? Seems worrying if someone who's not even a packager can block
> > packager
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
> > > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > > >
>
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are
> > > still
>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
> >
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are still
> > problematic, they have all received several personal emails over the
Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are still
> problematic, they have all received several personal emails over the last few
> weeks and none but one reacted.
> I will likely start to ping
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
> > cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
> > cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 25.06.20 um 14:55 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> > Here is an updated list:
> >
> > @certbot-sig
> >
> > Please do try to fix this soon!
>
> I'd love to but unfortunately I'm only a user for the certbot sig and even
> though
Am 25.06.20 um 14:55 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> Here is an updated list:
>
> @certbot-sig
>
> Please do try to fix this soon!
I'd love to but unfortunately I'm only a user for the certbot sig and even
though I think I'm probably the de-facto maintainer of the certbot stack now I
was not
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
> cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid
> bugzilla account associated with the email
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
> cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid
> bugzilla account associated with the email
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:08 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> > @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> > changed?
>
> Nothing has changed
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> changed?
Nothing has changed there.
You can make a @fedoraproject.org account, but without an
I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
@fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
changed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:37:42AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:15:17PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > > >Why aren't the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:15:17PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
> > >
On 16/06/20 17:15 -0400, Christopher wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
>Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
>[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
> >[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services
> >trying to use
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
>Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
>[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services
>trying to use my forwarding address for my account id rather than my FAS
>user
Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services trying
to use my forwarding address for my account id rather than my FAS user id.
My forwarding address is subject to change, but the FAS email alias is
static.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.20 um 22:10 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> > bpereto
>
> Benjamin was a previous maintainer of borgbackup. After the Python 3.9 rebuild
> I noticed that a new ticket was still assigned to him [1]. If I understood
> your
Am 13.06.20 um 22:10 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> bpereto
Benjamin was a previous maintainer of borgbackup. After the Python 3.9 rebuild
I noticed that a new ticket was still assigned to him [1]. If I understood
your email correctly this is because there is no corresponding bugzilla account?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:10:11AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:10:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > jkratoch
>
> This account is set as "inactive" in FAS. Couldn't you regenerate this list
> with inactive accounts excluded?
>
> I would like to remove this old
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:10:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> jkratoch
This account is set as "inactive" in FAS. Couldn't you regenerate this list
with inactive accounts excluded?
I would like to remove this old account but FAS admin interface cannot do
that, I can only set it as "inactive".
Good Morning Everyone,
If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid
bugzilla account associated with the email address you have set in FAS.
There are currently 66 users and groups who do not
Good Morning Everyone,
If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be
cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid
bugzilla account associated with the email address you have set in FAS.
There are currently 66 users and groups who do not
27 matches
Mail list logo
