On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:43:38PM -0500, Martin Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 16:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
> > 'dnf clean all'.
> >
> Having just
> downloaded
>
On 26/08/2022 01:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
'dnf clean all'.
Yes, the packages are no longer in the update list. So the errors are
gone for now. Thanks!
It's not fully clear yet some of the events. ;(
The person who used to
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 16:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
> 'dnf clean all'.
>
Having just
downloaded
https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/36/x86_64/os/Packages/m/mozilla-openh264-2.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
I get:
Name :
Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
'dnf clean all'.
It's not fully clear yet some of the events. ;(
The person who used to update this has moved to another group.
The SOP (standard operating procedure) for doing this update was
incorrect/out of
I just tried an update (`dnf update`, F36).
Three packages that are to be updated are from the fedora-cisco-openh264
repository.
In all three cases, I get the dnf output that these packages have not
been signed, which finally makes the GPG verification to fail.
The packages are:
