Re: Packages webapp status

2020-02-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 21:50, Richard Fearn wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and > > find some of its information helpfull. > > Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last >

Re: Packages webapp status

2020-02-07 Thread Richard Fearn
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and > find some of its information helpfull. Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last weekend that a few of the packages I maintain (e.g. clide,

Re: Packages webapp status

2020-02-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 01:37:36AM -0500, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 08:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:40 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 23:23, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > > > > > I suspect that a bulk of our users

Packages webapp status

2020-01-30 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 08:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:40 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 23:23, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > > > I suspect that a bulk of our users are similar to you. Given that you are > > > engaged on the thread (thank you!) what